Clinical Cancer Research · 2014 · 78 citations · 40 references
MedicineMolecular MedicineOncologyCancer GeneticsMetastasisMolecular OncologyMalignant NeoplasmsMolecular Tumor ProfilingOncogene AmplificationAmplificationGene Amplification TestingHistologic GradeMet-targeted TherapyMonitoring Therapy ResponsePten InactivationTherapy Response MonitoringTherapy Response Stratification
PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess MET amplification among different cancers, association with clinical factors and genetic aberrations and targeted therapy response modifications. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: From May 2010 to November 2012, samples from patients with advanced tumors referred to the MD Anderson Phase I Clinic were analyzed for MET gene amplification by FISH. Patient demographic, histologic characteristics, molecular characteristics, and outcomes in phase I protocols were compared per MET amplification status. RESULTS: Of 1,115 patients, 29 (2.6%) had MET amplification. The highest prevalence was in adrenal (2 of 13; 15%) and renal (4 of 28; 14%) tumors, followed by gastroesophageal (6%), breast (5%), and ovarian cancers (4%). MET amplification was associated with adenocarcinomas (P = 0.007), high-grade tumors (P = 0.003), more sites of metastasis, higher BRAF mutation, and PTEN loss (all P < 0.05). Median overall survival was 7.23 and 8.62 months for patients with and without a MET amplification, respectively (HR = 1.12; 95% confidence intervals, 0.83-1.85; P = 0.29). Among the 20 patients with MET amplification treated on a phase I protocol, 4 (20%) achieved a partial response with greatest response rate on agents targeting angiogenesis (3 of 6, 50%). No patient treated with a c-MET inhibitor (0 of 7) achieved an objective response. CONCLUSION: MET amplification was detected in 2.6% of patients with solid tumors and was associated with adenocarcinomas, high-grade histology, and higher metastatic burden. Concomitant alterations in additional pathways (BRAF mutation and PTEN loss) and variable responses on targeted therapies, including c-MET inhibitors, suggest that further studies are needed to target this population.
40
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
E. Eisenhauer, P. Therasse, Jan Bogaerts et al. · European Journal of Cancer · 2008 · 29.5K citations
Tumour micro-environment elicits innate resistance to RAF inhibitors through HGF secretion
Ravid Straussman, Teppei Morikawa, Kevin Shee et al. · Nature · 2012 · 1.7K citations · Full text
Medicine, Cancer Biology, Oncology +15
Scatter factor is a fibroblast-derived modulator of epithelial cell mobility
M. G. P. Stoker, Ermanno Gherardi, M. Benjamin Perryman et al. · Nature · 1987 · 1.3K citations