Environmental Protection and Nature as Distinct Attitudinal Objects

Florian G. Kaiser, Terry Hartig, Adrian Brügger, Caroline Duvier

Environment and Behavior · 2011 · 137 citations · 54 references

Concepts

TL;DR

In environmental psychology, appreciation of nature and environmental protection are often conflated into a single attitudinal category. The authors contend that this conflation is a misconception. Using survey data from 1,336 Swiss adults, they compared a one‑dimensional model with a two‑dimensional model distinguishing nature appreciation from environmental protection, employing a Rasch‑type measurement model to test the expected item‑factor structure. The two‑dimensional model proved statistically superior, offering modest improvements in reliability and accuracy, and suggesting that nature appreciation may be a more malleable target for promoting environmental engagement.

Abstract

In environmental psychology, many researchers have apparently placed appreciation of nature and appreciation of environmental protection in the same attitudinal category. In this article, the authors argue that this involves a misconception. The authors used survey data from 1,336 Swiss adults to compare competing attitudinal models: the currently accepted one-dimensional model against a two-dimensional model that distinguishes appreciation of nature from appreciation of environmental protection. A Rasch-type measurement model was implemented to test the theoretically anticipated item-factor structure. The model that treated appreciation of nature and appreciation of environmental protection as distinct attitudes was statistically superior to the one-dimensional model. The gains in reliability and model accuracy were modest, but the authors see substantial theoretical and practical value in treating appreciation of nature and appreciation of environmental protection as separate attitudes. For example, if the intention is to promote more environmental engagement, then appreciation of nature might be the more malleable target and thus the critical factor for change.

References

54