Reliability and Validity of the Computerized Revised Token Test: Comparison of Reading and Listening Versions in Persons With and Without Aphasia - Concepedia

Concepedia

Publication | Closed Access

Reliability and Validity of the Computerized Revised Token Test: Comparison of Reading and Listening Versions in Persons With and Without Aphasia

44

Citations

30

References

2015

Year

Malcolm R. McNeil, Sheila R. Pratt, Neil Szuminsky, Jee Eun Sung, Tepanta Fossett, Wiltrud Fassbinder, Kyoung Yuel Lim

Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research

Abstract

Intermodality differences were small, and all 4 versions were reliable, concurrently valid, and sensitive to similar linguistic processing difficulties in PWA.

References

	Year	Citations

Page 1