Representations of the Intellectual

Carole Elliott

Management Learning · 2003 · 375 citations · 20 references

Concepts

TL;DR

The article examines how CMS literature frames the relationship between management educators and practitioners through Gramsci’s theory of intellectuals. The author aims to reassess the role of management educators as intellectuals, using Gramsci’s dual conception of organic and traditional intellectuals to critique CMS’s emancipatory agenda and call for research into critical versus non‑critical classrooms. The study employs Gramsci’s concepts of organic and traditional intellectuals and his system of relations to analyze the interactions among management education, educators, and practitioners. The article concludes that CMS must focus on pedagogical processes, otherwise its emancipatory claims will remain muted.

Abstract

This article explores the contemporary relationship between management educators and practitioners, as expressed in the Critical Management Studies (CMS) literature, in the light of Gramsci’s writings on the formation and roles of intellectuals within society. His conception of intellectuals as being of two types—organic and traditional—is used as a heuristic to explore the claims made by critical management studies for an emancipatory agenda. Using Gramsci’s writings as a point of departure I stake out a position that starts to reconsider how management educators have come to acquire their perceived position of governance over what passes as management knowledge. I suggest that to do this we need to consider management education’s socio-cultural position. I adopt Gramsci’s notion of the ‘system of relations’ as a way to focus on the relationships between management education, management educators, and management practitioners. The article suggests that CMS needs to pay attention to the pedagogical processes of management education as much as to its content. I conclude that research that observes what are currently perceived as ‘critical’ and ‘non-critical’ management education classrooms must take place. Until this occurs, CMS’s claims for an emancipatory agenda must remain muted.

References

20