Food Security · 2015 · 62 citations · 27 references
Public HealthSustainable AgricultureFood SecurityGlobal GovernanceSustainable DevelopmentFood GovernanceFood System ResilienceFood System SustainabilityGovernance FrameworksSustainable Development GoalsSustainable Development GovernanceFood Security ResilienceGlobal Food GovernanceMulti-stakeholder CollaborationMulti-stakeholder ConsultationMulti-stakeholder OrganizationsMulti-stakeholder Processes
Feeding the world is not only a complex technical matter, but also a demanding governance issue. As food security has all the characteristics of a wicked problem (variety of problem definitions, conflicting interests, interconnectedness across scales, inherent uncertainties), conventional governance arrangements do not seem to work. New ways of concerted actions are introduced to better link global challenges with local practices. One example of this is the Global Agenda for Sustainable Livestock: a partnership of public, private, social, and civil society actors, committed to the sustainable development of the livestock sector. It aims to enhance shared understanding of sustainability and its underlying development issues and to build consensus on the path towards sustainable food security through dialogue, consultation, and joint analyses. This article analyses the Agenda as a new type of governance arrangement to enhance food security. It relies on a theoretical framework that consists of five governance capabilities, which are considered crucial for coping with wicked problems: reflexivity, resilience, responsiveness, revitalisation, and rescaling. The aim of this paper is threefold: 1) to assess the Agenda and learn from that; 2) to evaluate the capabilities framework as a tool to assess governance arrangements; and 3) to reflect on the potentials of new governance arrangements to deal with food security. The article illustrates how the governance capabilities framework can be used as a tool to analyse the multi-stakeholder platform for enhancing food security. It concludes that the Agenda successfully encompasses many elements of these capabilities although improvements are possible.
27
Dilemmas in a general theory of planning
Horst W. J. Rittel, Melvin M. Webber · Policy Sciences · 1973 · 15.3K citations · Full text
COPING WITH TRAGEDIES OF THE COMMONS
Annual Review of Political Science · 1999 · 1.4K citations · Full text
Natural Resources, Natural Resource Governance, Public Policy +12
The politics of attention: how government prioritizes problems
Choice Reviews Online · 2006 · 1.2K citations
Small wins: Redefining the scale of social problems.
Karl E. Weick · American Psychologist · 1984 · 1.1K citations