The Journal of Physical Chemistry · 1996 · 129 citations · 26 references
Natural SciencesChemistryElectrochemistryInorganic ChemistrySpectroscopyCharge Transfer ReactionsInorganic SpectroscopyMetal-ligand BondingTransition Metal ChemistryTransition Metal ComplexesAbsorption SpectraCharge DelocalizationCharge-transfer Excited StatesCharge-transfer SpectroscopyCharge-transfer StatesExcited-state AbsorptionMetal-ligand Charge TransferSpectroscopy Of Transition Metal Complexes
The absorption spectra of Ru II (NH 3 ) 5 L and Ru III (NH 3 ) 5 L (L is an aromatic N -heterocycle or nitrile) complexes in 50:50 glycerol−water glasses at 77 K ( D s = 3.9) are a function of the applied field in the 10 6 −10 7 V/m range. Analysis of the spectra in terms of the Liptay equations yields ground−excited state dipole-moment differences ranging from 4 to 37 D, depending upon the nature of L. The measured dipole moment differences, particularly those for the MLCT transitions, are much smaller than the values estimated from a simple consideration of the electron-transfer distances. The discrepancy between the observed and naive dipole-moment estimates arises mainly from the multielectron nature of the response to excitation. Good agreement is obtained with the predictions of a model which includes refinement of the effective electron-transfer distance, the shift in the valence electron distribution in the excited state, and the effects of electron delocalization (π-backbonding for Ru(II) and π-bonding for the Ru(III) complexes). Other contributions, namely the dipole moment induced by the NH 3 ligands and by the surrounding solvent molecules, are also considered.
26
Electric Moments of Molecules in Liquids
Lars Onsager · Journal of the American Chemical Society · 1936 · 5.3K citations
AlanG. Howard · Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry · 1988 · 189 citations