Competitive generalized auctions

Amos Fiat, Andrew V. Goldberg, Jason D. Hartline, Anna R. Karlin

2002 · 157 citations · 17 references

Concepts

TL;DR

The trivial approach of running a truthful auction and canceling if needed does not guarantee truthfulness, while generalized auctions can model many existing and new problems. The paper introduces mechanisms that are truthful and profit‑maximizing without probabilistic assumptions, presenting the concepts of cancellable and generalized auctions. They use variants of competitive analysis to design and analyze mechanisms, employing cancellable auctions as building blocks for generalized auctions that cancel if revenue falls below thresholds while preserving truthfulness. They provide the first truthful profit‑maximizing auctions for conditional financing and multicast.

Abstract

We describe mechanisms for auctions that are simultaneously truthful (alternately known as strategy-proof or incentive compatible) and guarantee high "net" profit. We make use of appropriate variants of competitive analysis of algorithms in designing and analyzing our mechanisms. Thus, we do not require any probabilistic assumptions on bids.We present two new concepts regarding auctions, that of a cancellable auction and that of a generalized auction. We use cancellable auctions in the design of generalized auctions, but they are of independent interest as well. Cancellable auctions have the property that if the revenue collected does not meet certain predetermined criteria, then the auction can be cancelled and the resulting auction is still truthful. The trivial approach (run a truthful auction and cancel if needed) yields an auction that is not necessarily truthfu.Generalized auctions can be used to model many problems previously considered in the literature, as well as numerous new problems. In particular, we give the first truthful profit-maximizing auctions for problems such as conditional financing and multicast.

References

17