Journal of Clinical Microbiology · 2014 · 348 citations · 31 references
Life SciencesInfectious DiseasesMicrobiologyAntimicrobial ResistanceGenomicsMedical MicrobiologyAntibiotic ResistanceAntibiotic Resistance MechanismsAntimicrobial Resistance GenomicsAntimicrobial Susceptibility TestingPathogen GenomicsResistance GenesAntimicrobial Resistance PatternsAntimicrobial Susceptibility InterpretationChromosomal Resistance MutationsGenetic Determinants Of ResistancePhenotypic Drug Susceptibility TestingPhenotypic Susceptibility AssessmentPhenotypic Susceptibility ProfilingResistance Phenotype Prediction
Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) could potentially provide a single platform for extracting all the information required to predict an organism's phenotype. However, its ability to provide accurate predictions has not yet been demonstrated in large independent studies of specific organisms. In this study, we aimed to develop a genotypic prediction method for antimicrobial susceptibilities. The whole genomes of 501 unrelated Staphylococcus aureus isolates were sequenced, and the assembled genomes were interrogated using BLASTn for a panel of known resistance determinants (chromosomal mutations and genes carried on plasmids). Results were compared with phenotypic susceptibility testing for 12 commonly used antimicrobial agents (penicillin, methicillin, erythromycin, clindamycin, tetracycline, ciprofloxacin, vancomycin, trimethoprim, gentamicin, fusidic acid, rifampin, and mupirocin) performed by the routine clinical laboratory. We investigated discrepancies by repeat susceptibility testing and manual inspection of the sequences and used this information to optimize the resistance determinant panel and BLASTn algorithm. We then tested performance of the optimized tool in an independent validation set of 491 unrelated isolates, with phenotypic results obtained in duplicate by automated broth dilution (BD Phoenix) and disc diffusion. In the validation set, the overall sensitivity and specificity of the genomic prediction method were 0.97 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.95 to 0.98) and 0.99 (95% CI, 0.99 to 1), respectively, compared to standard susceptibility testing methods. The very major error rate was 0.5%, and the major error rate was 0.7%. WGS was as sensitive and specific as routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods. WGS is a promising alternative to culture methods for resistance prediction in S. aureus and ultimately other major bacterial pathogens.
31
BLAST+: architecture and applications
Christiam Camacho, George Coulouris, Vahram Avagyan et al. · BMC Bioinformatics · 2009 · 23.2K citations · Full text
Velvet: Algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs
Daniel R. Zerbino, Ewan Birney · Genome Research · 2008 · 9.7K citations · Full text
Identification of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes
Ea Zankari, Henrik Hasman, Salvatore Cosentino et al. · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · 2012 · 5.2K citations · Full text
The Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database
Andrew G. McArthur, Nicholas Waglechner, Fazmin Nizam et al. · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · 2013 · 2.3K citations · Full text