Publication | Closed Access
Toward Sustainable Self-Determination: Rethinking the Contemporary Indigenous-Rights Discourse
293
Citations
9
References
2008
Year
ColonialismNative Environmental SovereigntySustainable DevelopmentSustainable Self-determinationIndigenous PeopleIndigenous MovementSocial SciencesPolitical EcologyIndigenous StudySelf-determination RightsSustainable Self-determination ProcessIndigenous HistoryIndigenous GovernanceLanguage StudiesTraditional Ecological KnowledgeIndigenous HeritageToward Sustainable Self-determinationIndigenous FeminismsIndigenous RightsEnvironmental JusticeCultureIndigenous IdentityIndigenous Knowledge SystemsIndigenous StudiesAnthropologyFirst NationSocial Justice
The current indigenous‑rights discourse limits self‑determination by downplaying the responsibilities and relationships indigenous peoples have with families and their natural environments, which are essential for future generations’ health and well‑being. The author proposes a holistic, dynamic concept of sustainable self‑determination as a benchmark for future indigenous political mobilization. The article uses case studies of community regeneration (FENAMAD in Peru and WELRP on Turtle Island) and reviews rights, mobilization, and ecosystem research to identify alternatives to the existing discourse that can support sustainable self‑determination worldwide. The study provides theoretical and applied insights for regenerating indigenous nationhood and restoring sustainable relationships on indigenous homelands.
More than eighty years since Chief Deskaheh petitioned the League of Nations for Haudenosaunee self-determination, it is becoming clearer that the existing rights discourse can take indigenous peoples only so far. States and global/regional forums have framed self-determination rights that deemphasize the responsibilities and relationships that indigenous peoples have with their families and the natural world (homelands, plant life, animal life, etc.) that are critical for the health and well-being of future generations. What is needed is a more holistic and dynamic approach to regenerating indigenous nations, and I propose the concept of sustainable self-determination as a benchmark for future indigenous political mobilization. Utilizing case studies of indigenous community regeneration such as the Native Federation of Madre de Dios (FENAMAD) in Peru and the White Earth Land Recovery Project (WELRP) on Turtle Island as well as analyzing the existing research on rights, political mobilization, and ecosystems, this article identifies alternatives to the existing rights discourse that can facilitate a meaningful and sustainable self-determination process for indigenous peoples around the world. Overall, findings from this research offer theoretical and applied understandings for regenerating indigenous nationhood and restoring sustainable relationships on indigenous homelands.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1