Publication | Closed Access
Agronomic Potential of Nectariless Cotton
32
Citations
0
References
1973
Year
EngineeringBotanyAgricultural EconomicsCrop ImprovementCrop QualityBc 6Sustainable AgricultureQuantitative GeneticsPlant ProductionGenetic VariationNectariless CottonPlant BreedingBiologyNatural SciencesEvolutionary BiologyCrop ScienceSeed StorageMississippi DeltaPlant Physiology
Abstract We compared three BC 6 F 4 nectariless strains of cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) with their recurrent parent varieties for yield, yield components, and fiber properties at six environments in 1971. A slight decrease (4.3%) in yield for nectariless ‘Stoneville 7A’ and a slight increase (3.8%) in yield for nectariless ‘Deltapine Smooth Leaf’ was detected. Nectaried and nectariless ‘Dixie King’ did not differ in yield. Nectariless strains, especially Deltapine Smooth Leaf tended to mature earlier. Slight but inconsistent differences in yield components of nectariless and nectaried strains were detected. Nectariless cottons tended to have shorter fibers. Significant genetic variability within BC 6 F 3 nectariless populations of Stoneville 7A was detected, indicating that we were not working with isogenic nectariless varieties. Selection within BC 5 nectariless Stoneville 7A resulted in yield improvement equal to that of nectaried Stoneville 7A. Fiber properties between nectaried and nectariless strains were essentially the same. The nectariless trait reduced boll rot. While the results from large field test were inconclusive, there were fewer tarnished plant bugs, fleahoppers, and less bollworm damage in nectariless cotton. Two predatory insects, lady beetles and big‐eyed bugs, were not affected by the presence or absence of nectaries. We detected no strong deleterious associations of nectariless and agronomic performance. This trait appears to have a good potential for insect and boll rot suppression in the Mississippi Delta.