Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2014 · 349 citations · 19 references
Life SciencesBiologyCell BiologyCell BiophysicsCytoskeletonPattern FormationCell MigrationCell Migration MechanicsCell PersistenceCellular MechanicsCytoskeletal RemodelingExtracellular MatrixCell Migration DynamicsCell Migration Through MatrixCell Motility ModelsCell Shape DynamicsCellular Mechanics Of MigrationPersistent Random WalksRandom Walk ModelsRemodeling
Cell motility has traditionally been modeled as a random walk, largely based on flat‑dish experiments, yet most cells migrate in three‑dimensional environments where this assumption may not hold. This study demonstrates that the persistence random walk model is inappropriate for describing 3D cell migration. The authors develop and validate a new 3D migration model that incorporates cell heterogeneity and anisotropic movement driven by local matrix remodeling.
Significance The motility of cells in the absence of gradients has long been described in terms of random walks. Most of what we know about eukaryotic cell migration has stemmed from well-controlled studies of cell migration on flat dishes. However, cells in vivo often move through 3D environments. Despite this difference, cell speed and persistence are typically extracted from fits using the same persistence random walk (PRW) model. This paper shows that the assumptions of the PRW model are erroneous for 3D cell migration. We introduce and validate a new model of 3D cell migration that takes into account cell heterogeneity and the anisotropic movements induced by local remodeling of the 3D matrix.
19
Muhammad H. Zaman, Linda M. Trapani, Alisha L. Sieminski et al. · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2006 · 1.2K citations · Full text
Focal adhesion size uniquely predicts cell migration
Dong‐Hwee Kim, Denis Wirtz · The FASEB Journal · 2012 · 362 citations · Full text