Postreplicative Mismatch Repair Factors Are Recruited to Epstein-Barr Virus Replication Compartments

Tohru Daikoku, Ayumi Kudoh, Yutaka Sugaya, Satoko Iwahori, Noriko Shirata, Hiroki Isomura, Tatsuya Tsurumi

Journal of Biological Chemistry · 2006 · 58 citations · 54 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

Abstract

The mismatch repair (MMR) system, highly conserved throughout evolution, corrects nucleotide mispairing that arise during cellular DNA replication. We report here that proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), the clamp loader complex (RF-C), and a series of MMR proteins like MSH-2, MSH-6, MLH1, and hPSM2 can be assembled to Epstein-Barr virus replication compartments, the sites of viral DNA synthesis. Levels of the DNA-bound form of PCNA increased with progression of viral productive replication. Bromodeoxyuridine-labeled chromatin immunodepletion analyses confirmed that PCNA is loaded onto newly synthesized viral DNA as well as BALF2 and BMRF1 viral proteins during lytic replication. Furthermore, the anti-PCNA, -MSH2, -MSH3, or -MSH6 antibodies could immunoprecipitate BMRF1 replication protein probably via the viral DNA genome. PCNA loading might trigger transfer of a series of host MMR proteins to the sites of viral DNA synthesis. The MMR factors might function for the repair of mismatches that arise during viral replication or act to inhibit recombination between moderately divergent (homologous) sequences. The mismatch repair (MMR) system, highly conserved throughout evolution, corrects nucleotide mispairing that arise during cellular DNA replication. We report here that proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), the clamp loader complex (RF-C), and a series of MMR proteins like MSH-2, MSH-6, MLH1, and hPSM2 can be assembled to Epstein-Barr virus replication compartments, the sites of viral DNA synthesis. Levels of the DNA-bound form of PCNA increased with progression of viral productive replication. Bromodeoxyuridine-labeled chromatin immunodepletion analyses confirmed that PCNA is loaded onto newly synthesized viral DNA as well as BALF2 and BMRF1 viral proteins during lytic replication. Furthermore, the anti-PCNA, -MSH2, -MSH3, or -MSH6 antibodies could immunoprecipitate BMRF1 replication protein probably via the viral DNA genome. PCNA loading might trigger transfer of a series of host MMR proteins to the sites of viral DNA synthesis. The MMR factors might function for the repair of mismatches that arise during viral replication or act to inhibit recombination between moderately divergent (homologous) sequences. Mismatch repair (MMR) 2The abbreviations used are: MMR, mismatch repair; MSH, MutS homolog; MLH, MutL homolog; PCNA, proliferating cell nuclear antigen; BrdUrd, 5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine; RF-C, replication factor C; EBV, Epstein-Barr virus; Pipes, 1,4-piperazinediethanesulfonic acid; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; PAA, phosphonoacetic acid. systems play a primary role in mutation avoidance by removing base-base and small insertion-deletion mismatches that arise during DNA replication (1Modrich P. Lahue R. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1996; 65: 101-133Crossref PubMed Scopus (1337) Google Scholar). Prokaryotes and eukaryotes have evolved similar systems for repair (2Kunkel T.A. Erie D.A. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2005; 74: 681-710Crossref PubMed Scopus (1023) Google Scholar) and in Escherichia coli MMR is initiated when MutS binds to mismatched DNA, possibly through its interaction with the β-clamp accessory protein that is required for processive DNA replication (3Lopez de Saro F.J. O'Donnell M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2001; 98: 8376-8380Crossref PubMed Scopus (182) Google Scholar, 4Su S.S. Lahue R.S. Au K.G. Modrich P. J. Biol. Chem. 1988; 263: 6829-6835Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar, 5Jiricny J. Su S.S. Wood S.G. Modrich P. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988; 16: 7843-7853Crossref PubMed Scopus (75) Google Scholar, 6Parker B.O. Marinus M.G. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1992; 89: 1730-1734Crossref PubMed Scopus (184) Google Scholar). MutL binds to MutS to form MutS-MutL-DNA complexes that stimulate MutH binding and cleavage of unmethylated DNA strands at GATC sequences, either 5′ or 3′ of recognized mismatches. Exonucleases then chew away at the DNA beyond the mismatch site so that highly accurate DNA polymerase III can correctly re-synthesize the strand. In eukaryotes, mismatch recognition is accomplished by MSH2 (MutS homolog 2) forming a heterodimer with either MSH3 or MSH6 to bind to distinct but overlapping spectra of mismatches (7Kolodner R.D. Marsischky G.T. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 1999; 9: 89-96Crossref PubMed Scopus (730) Google Scholar). In both the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and humans, the repair of base-base mismatches appears to be solely dependent on MSH2-MSH6, whereas both MSH2-MSH6 and MSH2-MSH3 can participate in the repair of small (1 to 12-nucleotide) loop insertions. Currently, it is thought that MSH heterodimer binding to a mismatch triggers ATP-dependent steps that allow interactions with MLH (MutL homolog) heterodimers composed of MLH1-Pms1 or MLH1-MLH3 (7Kolodner R.D. Marsischky G.T. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 1999; 9: 89-96Crossref PubMed Scopus (730) Google Scholar, 8Jiricny J. Nat. Genet. 2000; 24: 6-8Crossref PubMed Scopus (62) Google Scholar). No MutH homolog, however, has been identified in eukaryotes, and the exact details of strand discrimination and error removal are not known, although in both yeast and humans a number of other proteins have been implicated in MMR, including proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), replication factor C (RF-C), and DNA polymerases δ and ϵ (9Tran H.T. Gordenin D.A. Resnick M.A. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1999; 19: 2000-2007Crossref PubMed Scopus (182) Google Scholar, 10Longley M.J. Pierce A.J. Modrich P. J. Biol. Chem. 1997; 272: 10917-10921Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (179) Google Scholar, 11Johnson R.E. Kovvali G.K. Guzder S.N. Amin N.S. Holm C. Habraken Y. Sung P. Prakash L. Prakash S. J. Biol. Chem. 1996; 271: 27987-27990Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (180) Google Scholar, 12Umar A. Buermeyer A.B. Simon J.A. Thomas D.C. Clark A.B. Liskay R.M. Kunkel T.A. Cell. 1996; 87: 65-73Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (502) Google Scholar, 13Gu L. Hong Y. McCulloch S. Watanabe H. Li G.M. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998; 26: 1173-1178Crossref PubMed Scopus (185) Google Scholar, 14Lin Y.L. Shivji M.K. Chen C. Kolodner R. Wood R.D. Dutta A. J. Biol. Chem. 1998; 273: 1453-1461Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (129) Google Scholar, 15Szankasi P. Smith G.R. Science. 1995; 267: 1166-1169Crossref PubMed Scopus (184) Google Scholar, 16Tishkoff D.X. Boerger A.L. Bertrand P. Filosi N. Gaida G.M. Kane M.F. Kolodner R.D. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1997; 94: 7487-7492Crossref PubMed Scopus (334) Google Scholar). PCNA was originally characterized as a DNA sliding clamp for replicative DNA polymerases, but subsequent studies have revealed its striking ability to interact with multiple partners involved in several meta-bolic pathways (17Maga G. Hubscher U. J. Cell Sci. 2003; 116: 3051-3060Crossref PubMed Scopus (877) Google Scholar). One role of PCNA in MMR is mediated by interactions with MSH2-MSH6 or MSH2-MSH3 complexes through PCNA interaction motifs present in MSH6 and MSH3 (18Clark A.B. Valle F. Drotschmann K. Gary R.K. Kunkel T.A. J. Biol. Chem. 2000; 275: 36498-36501Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (182) Google Scholar, 19Flores-Rozas H. Clark D. Kolodner R.D. Nat. Genet. 2000; 26: 375-378Crossref PubMed Scopus (196) Google Scholar, 20Kleczkowska H.E. Marra G. Lettieri T. Jiricny J. Genes Dev. 2001; 15: 724-736Crossref PubMed Scopus (198) Google Scholar). PCNA increases the in vitro mispair binding specificity of the MSH2-MSH6 complex, and this is eliminated by amino acid substitutions in PCNA that cause MMR defects (19Flores-Rozas H. Clark D. Kolodner R.D. Nat. Genet. 2000; 26: 375-378Crossref PubMed Scopus (196) Google Scholar). It has been suggested that MMR may be coupled to DNA replication through the physical interaction between MutS family proteins and PCNA and through co-localization of PCNA with MSH6 and MSH3 in replication foci (18Clark A.B. Valle F. Drotschmann K. Gary R.K. Kunkel T.A. J. Biol. Chem. 2000; 275: 36498-36501Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (182) Google Scholar, 19Flores-Rozas H. Clark D. Kolodner R.D. Nat. Genet. 2000; 26: 375-378Crossref PubMed Scopus (196) Google Scholar, 20Kleczkowska H.E. Marra G. Lettieri T. Jiricny J. Genes Dev. 2001; 15: 724-736Crossref PubMed Scopus (198) Google Scholar). The PCNA-MSH6-MSH2 complex can form a stable ternary complex with fully base-paired DNA, but when a mispair is present, PCNA is excluded from the complex in an ATP-dependent fashion (21Lau P.J. Kolodner R.D. J. Biol. Chem. 2003; 278: 14-17Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (83) Google Scholar), suggesting that MSH2-MSH6 binds to PCNA to search of mispairs on newly replicated DNA and is then transferred from PCNA to the mispaired bases. PCNA with RF-C, between and and an that is by present, its function is to PCNA onto DNA J. F. H. J. N. O'Donnell M. J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1996; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, N. J. F. D. J. O'Donnell M. Genes 1996; PubMed Scopus (180) Google Scholar, G. O'Donnell M. J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1999; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). its with DNA at a PCNA and it onto DNA in the of this required for MMR Y. C. 1999; PubMed Google Scholar). PCNA loading is conserved and the DNA replication is with host cellular DNA and The Epstein-Barr virus is a with a DNA, in R. P.J. G. C. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). In cell of viral are and is of virus this from can or be is characterized by the of lytic to the of and to host cell The is by viral DNA replication composed of viral replication an a DNA a polymerase a and and to be and J. 1995; PubMed Google Scholar). lytic replication in sites in replication compartments, of viral replication viral DNA T. A. M. Y. H. N. T. J. 2005; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, S. K. T. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). progression of lytic replication the replication and to to form that the in T. A. M. Y. H. N. T. J. 2005; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). We have in protein is the of a to highly of lytic replication A. M. T. K. Y. S. Y. T. J. 2003; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). this system, could that of the lytic in of replication of cellular DNA replication of viral DNA A. M. T. K. Y. S. Y. T. J. 2003; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). We here for the that PCNA, RF-C, and a series of MMR proteins like MSH-2, MSH-6, MLH1, and hPSM2 are assembled to sites of viral DNA of lytic replication. Levels of the DNA-bound form of PCNA with progression of lytic replication and chromatin immunodepletion analyses with revealed that PCNA is loaded onto newly synthesized viral DNA as well as the BALF2 and BMRF1 viral PCNA and are viral replication might PCNA onto newly synthesized viral and interact with PCNA (19Flores-Rozas H. Clark D. Kolodner R.D. Nat. Genet. 2000; 26: 375-378Crossref PubMed Scopus (196) Google Scholar, 20Kleczkowska H.E. Marra G. Lettieri T. Jiricny J. Genes Dev. 2001; 15: 724-736Crossref PubMed Scopus (198) Google Scholar), loading might trigger transfer of a series of host MMR proteins to sites of viral DNA synthesis. Cell A. M. T. K. Y. S. Y. T. J. 2003; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar) in with and at in a lytic replication the was to the at a of and antibodies as BALF2 or BMRF1 protein in with or and as T. J. PubMed Google Scholar, T. J. N. M. T. H. Y. Y. J. 1998; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). The or antibodies of protein with and M. C. H. N. K. M. T. J. Biol. Chem. 1999; Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). The antibodies recognized proteins at and in cell from T. A. K. T. R. Y. J. PubMed Google Scholar) was with the protein as M. C. H. N. K. M. T. J. Biol. Chem. 1999; Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). was from and and antibodies from and -MSH3, and -MSH6 antibodies from and and antibodies from and was from was by S. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1998; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar) and polymerase δ by The or antibodies with or from with or at a of and at the The with phosphate-buffered at and for on with of Pipes, multiple for cell and The then to to nuclear that with in and at for The then to the chromatin and the nuclear was to the by and to for at for and with primary with and with on for and to the with for on with PBS, with in for for in in PBS, and then with the primary antibodies in The antibodies and used at the at and the and antibodies at The then for with or antibodies with or of the antibodies in either or newly synthesized DNA was by with to the for to the the with for at and then for with and with on for and to the then with for on and for with to the The with and with for in an was with and used for the of was as and then in to in on with in and with a in DNA DNA and yeast (1 and at for and at at with in for and then in and in was a with a and assembled in an at the with with PBS, and with for on and to the at for at and cell for protein a of proteins loaded for The proteins then as A. M. T. K. Y. S. Y. T. J. 2003; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). of proteins was with an immunodepletion as in in the of for synthesized DNA was by with to the for to in PBS, in for on and to The in with of in for at and then at for Cell in at and to the DNA to on not the for with of or of or as complexes of proteins to DNA with protein and with and for at by at for and then DNA was a from and onto DNA was with of and in the of at and with The with The with of -MSH2, -MSH3, and -MSH6 for at the of of the for at The then with and the in The to and to of PCNA to of with to lytic replication A. M. T. K. Y. S. Y. T. J. 2003; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar), and with a at not but nuclear proteins not to nuclear is to nuclear but the nuclear nuclear P. A.B. D.A. Cell. Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar), and proteins in have been to bind to chromatin or viral M. C. H. N. K. M. T. J. Biol. Chem. 1999; Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, M. Y. H. T. T. J. Biol. Chem. Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). We have that the BMRF1 polymerase factor a not in viral replication and the BALF2 protein is as distinct the replication T. A. M. Y. H. N. T. J. 2005; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). in a and the sites with antibodies with the foci of newly synthesized viral DNA as by and in analyses on Furthermore, that viral DNA of the as a of virus but cellular DNA in the and so the of by newly synthesized with for at and then for of DNA in was during the a and the that a of the DNA of the with that at are viral and not cellular BMRF1 sites of viral DNA BMRF1 protein was used as a for viral replication the MMR is involved in lytic DNA of PCNA, a protein involved in the of MMR, in lytic PCNA is an protein that is throughout the in it appears to be in foci of that have been to with newly replicated DNA with in H. P. A. T. D. J. Cell Biol. 2000; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). both and are to with PCNA to foci H.E. Marra G. Lettieri T. Jiricny J. Genes Dev. 2001; 15: 724-736Crossref PubMed Scopus (198) Google Scholar), it has been suggested that the MMR is coupled with DNA replication. in PCNA was to to and was as distinct the BMRF1 replication In PCNA was to in of the not although in a of the PCNA was to and was as throughout probably in in BALF2 proteins as distinct viral replication PCNA with for the BALF2 protein a and viral DNA replication was by the of PAA, a DNA polymerase viral sites by of the BALF2 protein as P. J. 2000; 74: PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). It the BALF2 protein is to the PCNA was by and not at the BALF2 sites in PCNA appears to at viral replication when viral DNA are PCNA clamp by not DNA binding and to interact with the clamp RF-C, for loading onto DNA in an ATP-dependent 1997; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). in was to with PCNA the replication Levels of PCNA the DNA-bound as the of PCNA during lytic cell from lytic at the and by in the of PCNA throughout the productive We have of viral replication and DNA replication proteins as and in lytic T. A. M. Y. H. N. T. J. 2005; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, T. A. M. Y. H. T. J. Biol. Chem. Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). In this with the in not proteins but nuclear proteins that are not to nuclear with to the of and DNA, proteins The proteins in the have been to bind to nuclear M. C. H. N. K. M. T. J. Biol. Chem. 1999; Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, M. Y. H. T. T. J. Biol. Chem. Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). in of protein was with the and of the was chromatin to but by the other of the protein was in the and was to with T. A. M. Y. H. N. T. J. 2005; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, T. A. M. Y. H. T. J. Biol. Chem. Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). in of the BALF2 protein was with at whereas of the BMRF1 protein of was Levels of the DNA-bound form of the BALF2 protein increased with progression of the lytic replication. of the BMRF1 protein in to as by not although of the T. J. PubMed Google Scholar, H. Chen J. 2000; 74: PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). The then with the of PCNA was in the and and the of the PCNA was to during with the cell not that PCNA as a form in the of replication. of lytic replication the of the DNA-bound form increased with to of the and lytic viral DNA replication but not DNA form of the BMRF1 protein here to be replication although and proteins are of the BALF2 protein was C and well with T. A. M. Y. H. N. T. J. 2005; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, A. M. T. K. Y. S. Y. T. J. 2003; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). In the of PAA, of the DNA the of the and of the BALF2 protein was in the The BALF2 protein might interact with the cellular to DNA in the of the protein might like the can in the of DNA P. J. Biol. Chem. Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar). The of the DNA-bound form of PCNA as well as of the BMRF1 protein and and of C and with the that PCNA was not in the when viral DNA was by that PCNA is loaded onto as well as BMRF1 protein when viral DNA are synthesized during lytic replication. PCNA onto DNA during the PCNA is loaded onto newly synthesized viral DNA, chromatin immunodepletion analyses lytic DNA replication is viral DNA although the T. A. M. Y. H. N. T. J. 2005; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, A. M. T. K. Y. S. Y. T. J. 2003; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). Furthermore, as was in the and in of DNA is viral newly synthesized with for to and then with in with and to the DNA with or or as complexes of proteins to DNA from the protein DNA was from the to and with and can the with in and with primary and protein in could the protein from the or in the and of DNA from the that viral replication proteins to the bind to newly synthesized viral DNA, whereas The form of protein was of the viral replication in T. and T. suggesting DNA binding of the The could not DNA as the that PCNA is loaded onto viral DNA synthesized of lytic MLH1, and with PCNA to with multiple partners including MMR proteins (17Maga G. Hubscher U. J. Cell Sci. 2003; 116: 3051-3060Crossref PubMed Scopus (877) Google Scholar). MMR is involved in viral of MMR proteins in the lytic antibodies to MLH1, and with a and then for studies that in viral productive DNA MLH1, and with PCNA in the viral replication that the of PCNA and the MutS and is with the interaction between PCNA and to form a complex, for mismatched sites during DNA replication (19Flores-Rozas H. Clark D. Kolodner R.D. Nat. Genet. 2000; 26: 375-378Crossref PubMed Scopus (196) Google Scholar, P.J. Kolodner R.D. J. Biol. Chem. 2003; 278: 14-17Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (83) Google Scholar). the other although MutL and PCNA PCNA in the and might of the complexes with either MSH2-MSH6 or MSH2-MSH3 at mispaired in the DNA Y. Sung P. Prakash L. Prakash S. J. Biol. Chem. 1998; 273: Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, Y. Sung P. Prakash L. Prakash S. Curr. Biol. 1997; Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, S. Modrich P. J. Biol. Chem. 2001; Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). that proteins involved in MMR are to viral replication compartments, this possibly mediated by DNA polymerase and and DNA polymerase function in of DNA and accurate repair DNA in steps of the MMR (2Kunkel T.A. Erie D.A. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2005; 74: 681-710Crossref PubMed Scopus (1023) Google Scholar, 10Longley M.J. Pierce A.J. Modrich P. J. Biol. Chem. 1997; 272: 10917-10921Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (179) Google Scholar, H. J. Biol. Chem. Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). polymerases, however, not in viral replication a and although for polymerase δ and ϵ in of not the other the polymerase protein was with PCNA and MSH2 in viral replication and The anti-PCNA, -MSH2, -MSH3, or -MSH6 BMRF1 PCNA and the MMR proteins loaded onto viral DNA during lytic analyses It has been that the BMRF1 protein not as a viral polymerase factor but binds to the viral synthesized during lytic replication T. A. M. Y. H. N. T. J. 2005; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). at with to and then with or or as complexes of proteins and for in anti-PCNA, -MSH2, -MSH3, and -MSH6 could BMRF1 protein from the whereas could could not immunoprecipitate PCNA and the MMR proteins not probably to an of the viral form of BMRF1 protein with for PCNA and the MMR The PCNA from the and suggesting a complex between PCNA and the that PCNA and a series of MMR proteins are with viral DNA during the lytic The present that PCNA and a series of MMR factors involved in the steps of MMR are to the sites of viral during lytic suggesting of MMR and DNA as is for the DNA replication The that DNA of the during the a and this and the DNA immunodepletion it is suggested that the with PCNA and a series of MMR proteins be viral It might be for PCNA to interact with a mismatch binding during the of the A. Buermeyer A.B. Simon J.A. Thomas D.C. Clark A.B. Liskay R.M. Kunkel T.A. Cell. 1996; 87: 65-73Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (502) Google Scholar, 13Gu L. Hong Y. McCulloch S. Watanabe H. Li G.M. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998; 26: 1173-1178Crossref PubMed Scopus (185) Google Scholar) to be loaded and to at strand R. Hubscher U. J. 1998; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). Mismatch in might be by 3′ to 5′ DNA to replicative with this is the 3′ to 5′ of polymerase δ and polymerase ϵ in mismatch (9Tran H.T. Gordenin D.A. Resnick M.A. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1999; 19: 2000-2007Crossref PubMed Scopus (182) Google Scholar, H. J. Biol. Chem. Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). the for PCNA as a factor with DNA polymerase δ during the of MMR is polymerase δ polymerase ϵ could be in viral replication in the present whereas the DNA polymerase was the replication T. A. M. Y. H. N. T. J. 2005; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). It might be that a DNA polymerase 3′ to 5′ could for mismatch and accurate repair at of MMR during lytic although the of of host DNA repair polymerases in the to be for physical interactions between viral replication proteins and the of MMR cellular from of lytic replication. the or could not immunoprecipitate PCNA or MMR proteins not the anti-PCNA, -MSH2, -MSH3, and -MSH6 antibodies could immunoprecipitate the BMRF1 protein of the in of of the BMRF1 protein with antibodies not suggesting interactions between viral and MMR it is that PCNA and the MMR factors interact with the BMRF1 protein via viral The of MMR and lytic DNA replication could either by MMR proteins to synthesized DNA or by MMR proteins as of the viral replication the may be virus it has been that PCNA in viral replication D. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, J. P. J. J. 2003; 9: PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). Furthermore, and J. PubMed Scopus (196) Google Scholar) have and cellular and viral proteins including PCNA, and MSH6 to be with the virus with MMR in the similar in virus DNA replication. mismatch repair systems play a primary role in mutation avoidance by removing base-base and small insertion-deletion mismatches that arise during DNA MMR factors are required for the repair of mismatches in DNA S. Kolodner R.D. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, F. Mol. Biol. Rev. 1999; PubMed Google Scholar). between similar but form a mispaired DNA and mismatches might be by MMR N. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1996; 16: PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, S. 1999; PubMed Google Scholar). In MMR to inhibit recombination between moderately divergent (homologous) M. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, A. M. S. 2000; PubMed Google Scholar). lytic recombination between DNA J. J. 1995; PubMed Google Scholar) and the interaction of MMR factors with mismatches that arise in DNA or possibly with other as during recombination in lytic replication as an of of the MMR in replication. It is that MMR proteins are required for both cell and of by DNA M. G. A. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2005; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, P. L. N. K. M. Marra G. Jiricny J. J. 2003; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). the have to be is that MMR proteins or sites as mismatches and during to repair DNA and might be and cell and are the DNA polymerase an 3′ to 5′ T. A. K. T. R. Y. J. PubMed Google Scholar, T. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar), of viral replication is thought to be Furthermore, the DNA polymerase is accurate DNA polymerases J. Y. S. Nucleic Acids Res. 15: PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). of the MMR with viral might function to viral to We for and for and and

References

54