NegotiationBehavioral Decision MakingMeasurementEthical PrinciplesEducationDecision AnalysisMultiple ScaleIndividual Decision MakingRational ChoiceDimensioning And TolerancingProportional ReasoningCollective ChoiceManagementDecision MakingDecision TheoryPublic PolicyScaling AnalysisStrategyNormative TheoryPriority SettingDecision ScienceSocial Responsibility
Priority setting involves complex, multi‑level decisions shaped by historical constraints, yet lacks clear ethical principles or analytical tools to resolve competing resource claims. The study proposes that priority setting be made more rational by focusing on decision‑making processes and structures, fostering reasoned, open debate that incorporates diverse perspectives, and building capacity for ongoing collective argument.
Priority setting is a complex interaction of multiple decisions at various levels in the organisation and constrained by history. There is no self evident set of ethical principles or analytical tools to determine what decisions we should take at various levels, nor is there an obvious or easy way to resolve the clash of claims on resources. To make priority setting more "rational" we should concentrate on the processes and structure of decision making and the relation of macro and micro decisions. The debate should promote reasoned, informed, and open argument, draw on a variety of perspectives, and involve a plurality of interests. The aim must be to build up, over time, the capacity to engage in continuous, collective argument.
5
Epidemic Herpetic Stomatitis in an Orphanage Nursery
BOBBY D. HALE, Robert C. Rendtorff, Lillie C. Walker et al. · JAMA · 1963 · 54 citations
Public disagrees with professionals over NHS rationing.
Trish Groves · PubMed · 1993 · 33 citations
Public disagrees with professionals over NHS rationing
Bryan Christie · BMJ · 1993 · 19 citations · Full text