Dimensions of rationing: who should do what?

R. Klein

BMJ · 1993 · 93 citations · 5 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

Priority setting involves complex, multi‑level decisions shaped by historical constraints, yet lacks clear ethical principles or analytical tools to resolve competing resource claims. The study proposes that priority setting be made more rational by focusing on decision‑making processes and structures, fostering reasoned, open debate that incorporates diverse perspectives, and building capacity for ongoing collective argument.

Abstract

Priority setting is a complex interaction of multiple decisions at various levels in the organisation and constrained by history. There is no self evident set of ethical principles or analytical tools to determine what decisions we should take at various levels, nor is there an obvious or easy way to resolve the clash of claims on resources. To make priority setting more "rational" we should concentrate on the processes and structure of decision making and the relation of macro and micro decisions. The debate should promote reasoned, informed, and open argument, draw on a variety of perspectives, and involve a plurality of interests. The aim must be to build up, over time, the capacity to engage in continuous, collective argument.

References

5