Financial Review · 2009 · 610 citations · 38 references
BusinessFinanceFinancial ManagementCorporate FinanceCorporate Social ResponsibilityCorporate StrategyCorporate SustainabilityCorporate Sustainability StrategyFinancial RiskPortfolio Risk ManagementSustainability Performance ManagementSustainability StrategyCorporate Performance MeasurementCorporate Performance MetricsCorporate Social Performance MeasurementCorporate Social Responsibility PerformanceGlobal EquityIdiosyncratic Risk PricingMarket Portfolio StrategyPortfolio Return Performance
Abstract Does investing in sustainability leaders affect portfolio performance? Analyzing two mutually exclusive leading and lagging global corporate sustainability portfolios (Dow Jones) finds that (1) leading sustainability firms do not underperform the market portfolio, and (2) their lagging counterparts outperform the market portfolio and the leading portfolio. Notably, we find leading (lagging) corporate social performance (CSP) firms exhibit significantly lower (higher) idiosyncratic risk and that idiosyncratic risk might be priced by the broader global equity market. We develop an idiosyncratic risk factor and find that its inclusion significantly reduces the apparent difference in performance between leading and lagging CSP portfolios.
38
The Cross‐Section of Expected Stock Returns
Eugene F. Fama, Kenneth R. French · The Journal of Finance · 1992 · 15.1K citations · Full text
Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis
Marc Orlitzky, Frank L. Schmidt, Sara L. Rynes · Organization Studies · 2003 · 7.5K citations
Multifactor Explanations of Asset Pricing Anomalies
Eugene F. Fama, Kenneth R. French · The Journal of Finance · 1996 · 6.5K citations · Full text