Journal of Forensic Sciences · 2014 · 26 citations · 11 references
Microscopic saw mark analysis is a well published and generally accepted qualitative analytical method. However, little research has focused on identifying and mitigating potential sources of error associated with the method. The presented study proposes the use of classification trees and random forest classifiers as an optimal, statistically sound approach to mitigate the potential for error of variability and outcome error in microscopic saw mark analysis. The statistical model was applied to 58 experimental saw marks created with four types of saws. The saw marks were made in fresh human femurs obtained through anatomical gift and were analyzed using a Keyence digital microscope. The statistical approach weighed the variables based on discriminatory value and produced decision trees with an associated outcome error rate of 8.62-17.82%.
11
Leo Breiman · Machine Learning · 2001 · 119.3K citations · Full text
Classification and Regression by randomForest
Andy Liaw, Matthew C. Wiener · 2007 · 18.4K citations
Tool Marks in Bones and Cartilage
W Bonte · Journal of Forensic Sciences · 1975 · 77 citations