Capabilities, well‐being and human development: A survey

Mozaffar Qizilbash

The Journal of Development Studies · 1996 · 167 citations · 43 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Economists have shifted from viewing development solely as per‑capita GNP growth to adopting Amartya Sen’s capability approach, which defines development as an expansion of individuals’ quality‑of‑life capabilities. The article contends that Sen’s capability framework, along with its variants by Nussbaum and Frankfurt, is insufficient for explaining human development, proposing instead James Griffin’s well‑being theory as a more promising foundation.

Abstract

Economists have moved away from thinking of development in terms of growth of per capita GNP. The most influential alternative conception of development ‐ due to Amartya Sen ‐ involves judging the quality of life in terms of capabilities and viewing development as a 'capability expansion'. This article argues that Sen's approach is an inadequate account of development. It is further argued that other versions of the approach ‐ involving the work of Nussbaum and Frankfurt ‐ also fail. The most promising foundation for an account of human development derives from James Griffin's recent writings on well‐being.

References

43