Diseases of the Colon & Rectum · 2005 · 35 citations · 45 references
MedicineGeneticsOncologyCancer GeneticsCarcinogenesisMolecular OncologyCancer Genomic InstabilityCancer Molecular PathologyColorectal CancerMalignant NeoplasmsMicrosatellite InstabilityMolecular Classification Of TumorsColorectal Cancer PathologyMicrosatellite DistributionMicrosatellite Instability In Colorectal CancerMicrosatellite Instability PhenotypingMicrosatellite MarkersPolymerase Chain Reaction-based Microsatellite Instability AnalysisPromoter HypermethylationPromoter Methylation
PURPOSE: The proportion of colorectal cancers located proximal to the splenic flexure increases with age. Colorectal cancers of the microsatellite instability phenotype are preferentially located in the proximal colon. We investigated the location of colorectal cancer with this phenotype in different age groups to determine whether different molecular mechanisms could account for the changes in distribution of colorectal cancers. METHODS: A representative sample of 230 colorectal cancers from three age groups (<45 years, 60-70 years, >87 years) was selected from a subset of The Upper Midwest Oncology Medical Registries database. Microsatellite instability was determined by polymerase chain reaction using a panel of five microsatellite markers. The presence of new microsatellite alleles at two or more loci was scored as microsatellite instability. Tumors were otherwise considered microsatellite stable. MLH1 and MSH2 expression was determined by immunohistochemistry. Methylation of the MLH1 gene promotor was determined by methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction assay. RESULTS: The proportion of tumors of the microsatellite instability phenotype was 21 percent in the young group, 15 percent in the middle group, and 33 percent in the old group. More tumors of the microsatellite instability phenotype were proximal compared with microsatellite-stable tumors in all three age groups, but the differences were significant only for the old group. Tumors of the microsatellite instability phenotype in the older group were associated with MLH1 inactivation (24/29 or 83 percent), MLH1 promoter methylation (18/29 or 62 percent), and proximal location (25/29 or 86 percent), while tumors in the young group were associated with MSH2 inactivation (8/18 or 44 percent) and distal location (11/18 or 62 percent). CONCLUSION: The age-related proximal shift of colorectal cancers is associated with the microsatellite instability phenotype, MLH1 inactivation, and MLH1 promoter hypermethylation.
45
C. Richard Boland, Stephen N. Thibodeau, Stanley R. Hamilton et al. · PubMed · 1998 · 4.1K citations
Life Sciences, Genetics, Oncology +17
CpG island methylator phenotype in colorectal cancer
Minoru Toyota, Nita Ahuja, Mutsumi Ohe-Toyota et al. · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 1999 · 2.5K citations
Genetic instability in colorectal cancers
Christoph Lengauer, Kenneth W. Kinzler, Bert Vogelstein · Nature · 1997 · 2K citations