PLoS ONE · 2013 · 203 citations · 36 references
MedicineNuclear MedicineRadiologyDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic Nuclear MedicineRadiation DosimetryComputed TomographyHepatobiliary ImagingLiver ImagingMedical ImagingNuclear Medicine ImagingPositron Emission TomographyBremsstrahlung RadiationClinical IllustrationDose Distribution To The LiverImage-based Dose CalculationLiver DosimetryPet Image ReconstructionPet QuantificationYttrium-90 Radioembolization
BACKGROUND: After yttrium-90 ((90)Y) microsphere radioembolization (RE), evaluation of extrahepatic activity and liver dosimetry is typically performed on (90)Y Bremsstrahlung SPECT images. Since these images demonstrate a low quantitative accuracy, (90)Y PET has been suggested as an alternative. The aim of this study is to quantitatively compare SPECT and state-of-the-art PET on the ability to detect small accumulations of (90)Y and on the accuracy of liver dosimetry. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: SPECT/CT and PET/CT phantom data were acquired using several acquisition and reconstruction protocols, including resolution recovery and Time-Of-Flight (TOF) PET. Image contrast and noise were compared using a torso-shaped phantom containing six hot spheres of various sizes. The ability to detect extra- and intrahepatic accumulations of activity was tested by quantitative evaluation of the visibility and unique detectability of the phantom hot spheres. Image-based dose estimates of the phantom were compared to the true dose. For clinical illustration, the SPECT and PET-based estimated liver dose distributions of five RE patients were compared. At equal noise level, PET showed higher contrast recovery coefficients than SPECT. The highest contrast recovery coefficients were obtained with TOF PET reconstruction including resolution recovery. All six spheres were consistently visible on SPECT and PET images, but PET was able to uniquely detect smaller spheres than SPECT. TOF PET-based estimates of the dose in the phantom spheres were more accurate than SPECT-based dose estimates, with underestimations ranging from 45% (10-mm sphere) to 11% (37-mm sphere) for PET, and 75% to 58% for SPECT, respectively. The differences between TOF PET and SPECT dose-estimates were supported by the patient data. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: In this study we quantitatively demonstrated that the image quality of state-of-the-art PET is superior over Bremsstrahlung SPECT for the assessment of the (90)Y microsphere distribution after radioembolization.
36
Andrew S. Kennedy, Subir Nag, Riad Salem et al. · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · 2007 · 676 citations
Physical and clinical performance of the mCT time-of-flight PET/CT scanner
Bjoern Jakoby, Yanic Bercier, Maurizio Conti et al. · Physics in Medicine and Biology · 2011 · 483 citations