Journal of Diabetes Research · 2015 · 32 citations · 38 references
MedicineBiostatisticsEndocrinologyClinical Classification SystemsClinical EpidemiologyClinical NutritionAdipose TissueBody CompositionMetabolic EndocrinologyMetabolic EvaluationMetabolic SyndromeObesity EpidemiologyAbdominal AdiposityCutoff PointsDiagnosis Specificity ImprovementMetabolic Syndrome ScreeningObesity ScreeningSex Differences In ObesitySubjectsWaist Circumference Measurement
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to analyze the influence of metabolic phenotypes during the construction of ROC curves for waist circumference (WC) cutpoint selection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1,902 subjects of both genders were selected from the Maracaibo City Metabolic Syndrome Prevalence Study database. Two-Step Cluster Analysis (TSCA) was applied to select metabolically healthy and sick men and women. ROC curves were constructed to determine WC cutoff points by gender. RESULTS: Through TSCA, metabolic phenotype predictive variables were selected: HOMA2-IR and HOMA2-βcell for women and HOMA2-IR, HOMA2-βcell, and TAG for men. Subjects were classified as healthy normal weight, metabolically obese normal weight, healthy and metabolically disturbed overweight, and healthy and metabolically disturbed obese. Final WC cutpoints were 91.50 cm for women (93.4% sensitivity, 93.7% specificity) and 98.15 cm for men (96% sensitivity, 99.5% specificity). CONCLUSIONS: TSCA in the selection of the groups used in ROC curves construction proved to be an important tool, aiding in the detection of MOWN and MHO which cannot be identified with WC alone. The resulting WC cutpoints were <91.00 cm for women and <98.00 cm for men. Furthermore, anthropometry is insufficient to determine healthiness, and, biochemical analysis is needed to properly filter subjects during classification.
38
Ömer Toprak, Hüseyin Kurt, Yasin Sarı et al. · Kidney & Blood Pressure Research · 2017 · 29.7K citations · Full text
Medicine, Endocrinology, Nutrition +17
Scott M. Grundy · JAMA · 1993 · 27.9K citations
Evaluation Expert Panel on Detection · JAMA · 2001 · 26K citations
Medicine, Cardiology, Otolaryngology +10