The Journal of Experimental Education · 2011 · 32 citations · 17 references
Social SciencesBehavioral SciencesBiostatisticsItem Response TheoryPsychometricsStatisticsConfidence IntervalsDichotomous Item ModelsItem AnalysisMeasurement PrecisionPsychological TestingTest ReliabilityCoefficient AlphaConfidence Interval EstimationConfidence Interval EvaluationItem Response Theory AnalysisItem Response Theory ScalingMonte Carlo EstimationRating Scale Analysis
Abstract In this study, the authors aimed to examine 8 of the different methods for computing confidence intervals around alpha that have been proposed to determine which of these, if any, is the most accurate and precise. Monte Carlo methods were used to simulate samples under known and controlled population conditions wherein the underlying item distribution is nonnormal and when the items' responses are those of rating scales rather than dichotomous items. Overall, one can conclude that, despite concerns expressed over the use of Fisher's method for coefficient alpha, in general, it actually outperformed the other methods. Larger sample sizes and larger coefficient alphas also resulted in better band coverage, whereas smaller number of items resulted in poorer band coverage. Keywords: coefficient alphaconfidence intervalsFisher's z transformationsrating scalesreliability
17
Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests
Lee J. Cronbach · Psychometrika · 1951 · 43.2K citations · Full text
Social Sciences, Educational Assessment, Educational Measurement +14
Statistical Methods for Research Workers
American Journal of Clinical Pathology · 1945 · 11.1K citations