Publication | Open Access
WTO Dispute Settlement and Human Rights
270
Citations
0
References
2002
Year
NegotiationRegional Human Rights SystemsGlobal Health LawLegal ImplicationsConstitutional LawLawAdministrative LawInternational Environmental LawInternational Constitutional LawInternational CourtConflict Of LawPublic HealthPublic PolicyWto Dispute SettlementInternational RelationsHuman RightsInternational LawHuman Rights LawInternational Humanitarian LawPublic International LawInternational OrganizationWorld Trade Organization Law
The WTO dispute settlement system can address disputes with human rights claims, but its bodies cannot formally interpret other treaties or enforce rights beyond covered agreements, limiting their ability to enforce human rights obligations. The paper asks how WTO adjudicating bodies would handle human rights issues and proposes that WTO law should evolve to be consistently interpreted with international human rights law. The authors advocate a good‑faith interpretation of WTO provisions, including exception clauses, to align WTO law with human rights principles. The Doha Declaration on TRIPS and Public Health exemplifies this approach, showing that while WTO members may be liable for human rights violations, enforcement is limited, yet human rights can still be respected through proper interpretation of WTO provisions.
The World Trade Organization (WTO) dispute settlement system could be seized of a dispute carrying human rights claims or arguments in support of either a complaint or a defence. How would WTO adjudicating bodies address this issue? It is suggested that WTO law must evolve and be interpreted consistently with international law, including human rights law. Thus, a good faith interpretation of the provisions of the WTO, including its exception provisions, should lead to a reading and application of WTO law consistent with human rights. The recent Doha Declaration on TRIPS and Public Health is a good example of such a possible coherent reading of WTO provisions taking into account potentially relevant human rights law. WTO adjudicating bodies cannot formally interpret other treaties and customs and thus cannot apply or enforce other treaties or customs or determine the legal consequences of rights and obligations that WTO Members may have under other treaties or by custom; these may be examined only when necessary for the interpretation of WTO law and/or as a factual determination. WTO Members do not appear to have granted WTO remedies for the enforcement of rights and obligations other than those under the ‘covered agreements’. Since states are bound simultaneously by all their international rights and obligations, WTO Members in violation of human rights law may be liable, but this responsibility cannot be enforced by WTO adjudicating bodies. Yet human rights can be respected through good interpretation and application of WTO provisions.