Funding Implications of Social Enterprise: The Role of Mission Consistency, Entrepreneurial Competence, and Attitude toward Social Enterprise on Donor Behavior

Brett R. Smith, Maria L. Cronley, Terri Feldman Barr

Journal of Public Policy & Marketing · 2012 · 80 citations · 32 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Social entrepreneurship encompasses social enterprises, which are nonprofit organizations that employ for‑profit strategies, and nonprofits increasingly adopt them to fund their missions. This study seeks to clarify how adopting a social enterprise influences overall funding and identify the conditions that enhance its effectiveness. Using a mixed‑method, three‑study design, the authors examined the impact of introducing a social enterprise on individual donations. They found that while a social enterprise initially reduces individual donations, the negative effect is lessened when the enterprise is seen as mission‑consistent and competent, and donor attitudes toward social enterprises further moderate these effects, underscoring implications for marketing, entrepreneurship, and public policy.

Abstract

Social entrepreneurship covers a broad domain, including social enterprise, defined as the use of for-profit strategies by nonprofit organizations. Driven by multiple factors, nonprofit organizations have increasingly turned to social enterprise in the hopes of funding their social missions. However, only limited research has fully delineated how the use of social enterprises affects overall funding and the conditions under which social enterprises are relatively more effective. This mixed-method, three-study project provides evidence that the introduction of a social enterprise negatively affects individual donations but that some of the negative effects can be mitigated when the social enterprise is perceived as mission consistent and competent. In addition, the results show that donor attitudes toward social enterprises moderate the effects. The results of these studies have important implications for marketing, social entrepreneurship, and public policy.

References

32