2013 · 11 citations · 10 references
EngineeringComputer EngineeringElectrical EngineeringComputer ArchitectureMicroelectronicsVlsi DesignCmos Circuit DesignDelay ModelingIntegrated Circuit DesignMixed-signal Integrated Circuit DesignPhysical Unclonable FunctionsTiming AnalysisArbiter Physical Unclonable FunctionsAsic ImplementationDelay-based Physical Unclonable FunctionsElectronic Physical Unclonable FunctionsPhysically Unclonable FunctionsSilicon
This paper presents a comparative study of delay Physically Unclonable Functions (PUFs) designed in CMOS-65nm technology platforms: ASIC and FPGA (Xilinx Virtex-5). The performances are analyzed for two types of silicon PUFs, namely the arbiter and the loop PUFs. For this purpose, a PUF has been specifically designed, the "mixed PUF", to allow a fair comparison between the two structures. The principle of the mixed PUF design consists on the use of the same delay chains for both PUFs. The analysis is based on PUF responses obtained at different operating conditions for 18 ASICs. Each one embeds 49 PUF instances. The comparison analysis reveals that overall the arbiter PUF structure has the worst performance when compared to the loop PUF, on both platforms.
10
Silicon physical random functions
Blaise Gassend, Dwaine Clarke, Marten van Dijk et al. · 2002 · 1.6K citations
Engineering, Computer Engineering, Electrical Engineering +17
Modeling attacks on physical unclonable functions
Ulrich Rührmair, Frank Sehnke, Jan Sölter et al. · 2010 · 1K citations · Full text
Extended abstract: The butterfly PUF protecting IP on every FPGA
Sandeep Kumar, Jorge Guajardo, Roel Maes et al. · 2008 · 540 citations