PLoS ONE · 2010 · 54 citations · 15 references
Life SciencesBiologyMicrobiologyBacteriologyMicrobial EcologyMicrobial GeneticsBacterial EcologyBacterial SurvivalMicrobial Community DynamicsMicrobial CompetitionMicrobial CooperationQuorum SensingDeleterious Mutation AccumulationDeleterious Mutation EffectsQuorum Sensing CompetitionQuorum Sensing RegulationQuorum Sensing SignalingQuorum Sensing SignalsResilienceSignals
BACKGROUND: Members of swarming bacterial consortia compete for nutrients but also use a co-operation mechanism called quorum sensing (QS) that relies on chemical signals as well as other secreted products ("public goods") necessary for swarming. Deleting various genes of this machinery leads to cheater mutants impaired in various aspects of swarming cooperation. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Pairwise consortia made of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, its QS mutants as well as B. cepacia cells show that a interspecies consortium can "combine the skills" of its participants so that the strains can cross together barriers that they could not cross alone. In contrast, deleterious mutants are excluded from consortia either by competition or by local population collapse. According to modeling, both scenarios are the consequence of the QS signalling mechanism itself. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The results indirectly explain why it is an advantage for bacteria to maintain QS systems that can cross-talk among different species, and conversely, why certain QS mutants which can be abundant in isolated niches, cannot spread and hence remain localized.
15
THE MAJOR TRANSITIONS OF EVOLUTION
Egbert Giles Leigh · Evolution · 1995 · 3K citations · Full text
The major evolutionary transitions
Eörs Szathmáry, John Maynard Smith · Nature · 1995 · 1.1K citations
Cooperation and conflict in quorum-sensing bacterial populations
Stephen P. Diggle, Ashleigh S. Griffin, Geneviève Campbell et al. · Nature · 2007 · 859 citations
Life Sciences, Biology, Microbiology +12