Publication | Closed Access
The Role of Big 6 Auditors in the Credible Reporting of Accruals
1.4K
Citations
30
References
1999
Year
AuditingNasdaq FirmsContinuous AuditingAccountingAccounting PracticeBusinessCredible ReportingBig 6Audit RegulationAudit QualityTotal AccrualsAudit OversightFinancial AccountingAccounting AuditFinanceAudit Market Structure
High‑accrual firms face greater opportunities for earnings manipulation and thus seek Big 6 auditors to enhance earnings credibility. The study examines whether firms with a higher propensity to generate accruals are more likely to employ a Big 6 auditor. Across NASDAQ firms 1975–1994, firms with a higher endogenous accrual propensity were more likely to use a Big 6 auditor, yet these firms reported lower discretionary accruals, indicating that Big 6 auditors constrain aggressive accrual reporting.
This study investigates if the use of a Big 6 auditor is increasing in the firm's endogenous propensity to generate accruals. High-accrual firms have greater scope for aggressive and/or opportunistic earnings management and therefore have an incentive to hire a Big 6 auditor to provide assurance that reported earnings are credible. For a large sample of NASDAQ firms over the period 1975–1994 we find that the likelihood of using a Big 6 auditor is increasing in firms' endogenous propensity for accruals. Even though Big-6-audited firms have higher levels of total accruals, we also find they have lower amounts of estimated discretionary accruals. This finding is consistent with Big 6 auditors constraining aggressive and potentially opportunistic reporting of accruals.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
1976 | 69.2K | |
1991 | 8.4K | |
1981 | 6.5K | |
1985 | 3.3K | |
1998 | 3.3K | |
1998 | 3.2K | |
1994 | 2.8K | |
1994 | 2.7K | |
1996 | 1.7K | |
1995 | 1.5K |
Page 1
Page 1