Belgian Journal of Linguistics · 2008 · 143 citations · 5 references
NegotiationPragmatic AnalysisAutonomyDiscourse AgentOrganizational BehaviorSyntaxDiscourse AnalysisLanguage StudiesPossible-worlds FrameworkOrganizational CommitmentCommitment ModelPragmaticsDiscourse StructureBusinessRhetorical TheoryImplicatureQuestioning UseLinguisticsSocial Exchange Theory
This paper addresses certain restrictions on the use of declaratives as questions in English. Declaratives are taken to express commitment by the speaker, even in a questioning use. The analysis traces the restrictions to two distinct contextual factors: (i) a general principle requiring that a commitment have a recognized source , i.e., a discourse agent who plausibly has independent evidence supporting the content committed to; (ii) specific to a questioning interpretation, the need for the context to support the inference that the speaker’s commitment depends upon the addressee’s anticipated confirmation. Rising intonation contributes a very general element of meaning, indicating that the utterance it marks is contingent upon some discourse condition obtaining; the specific conditions required for a questioning interpretation instantiate one such type of contingency. The proposals are modeled via elaboration of standard contextual structures in a possible-worlds framework.
5
Mathematical models of dialogue<sup>1</sup>
C. L. Hamblin · Theoria · 1971 · 269 citations
Natural Language Processing, Engineering, Dialogue Management +10
The contrast between interrogatives and questions
Rodney Huddleston · Journal of Linguistics · 1994 · 185 citations
Interpreting Intonation: A Modular Approach
Daniel Hirst · Journal of Semantics · 1983 · 20 citations
Intonation Meaning, Language Experience, Neurolinguistics +24