Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · 2010 · 72 citations · 17 references
PharmacyMedicinal ChemistryPharmacologyDrug DiscoveryStatistical ModelingStructure-activity RelationshipsDecision TreesGaussian Process ModelingGaussian ProcessesModel BuildingQuantitative Structure-activity RelationshipsSupport Vector MachinesChemometric Drug ClassificationComputational Structure-activity ModelingMachine Learning For AdmetPartial Least Squares RegressionPredictive Modeling Of BioactivityProbit RegressionRandom Forest ClassificationStructure-activity Relationship Modeling
In this article, we extend the application of the Gaussian processes technique to classification quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling problems. We explore two approaches, an intrinsic Gaussian processes classification technique and a probit treatment of the Gaussian processes regression method. Here, we describe the basic concepts of the methods and apply these techniques to building category models of absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, toxicity and target activity data. We also compare the performance of Gaussian processes for classification to other known computational methods, namely decision trees, random forest, support vector machines, and probit partial least squares. The results indicate that, while no method consistently generates the best model, the Gaussian processes classifier often produces more predictive models than those of the random forest or support vector machines and was rarely significantly outperformed.
17
Leo Breiman · Machine Learning · 2001 · 126.2K citations · Full text
Mark Hall, Eibe Frank, Geoffrey Holmes et al. · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · 2009 · 17.8K citations
Encyclopedia of computational chemistry
Choice Reviews Online · 1999 · 1.1K citations
Natural Sciences, Chemistry, Physics +12
Yuan H. Zhao, Joelle Le, Michael H. Abraham et al. · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · 2001 · 521 citations