Applied Psychological Measurement · 2007 · 35 citations · 37 references
EducationEducational AssessmentEducational MeasurementDifferential Item FunctioningMeasurement InvariancePsychometricsDifferential Test FunctioningItem AnalysisItem Characteristic CurvesItem Parameter InvariancePsychological TestingLikert ItemsLikert-type ItemsMeasurement Model InvarianceMonte Carlo EstimationPolytomous Differential Item FunctioningPolytomous Item Differential FunctioningScore-level Dif DetectionSensitivity
This article highlights issues associated with the use of the differential functioning of items and tests (DFIT) methodology for assessing measurement invariance (or differential functioning) with Likert-type data. Monte Carlo analyses indicate relatively low sensitivity of the DFIT methodology for identifying differential item functioning (DIF) under some conditions of differential functioning with previously recommended significance values. The differential test functioning index was extremely insensitive to differential functioning under all study conditions. The authors recommend alternative noncompensatory DIF cutoff values used to evaluate the significance of DIF for different DIF effect sizes. Additionally, contrasts between polytomous and dichotomous data are drawn, and problems with determining measurement invariance at the scale, rather than item, level for Likert scale data are highlighted.
37
Journal of social behavior and personality
Personality and Individual Differences · 1986 · 6.8K citations
A First Course in Factor Analysis
Barbara Price · Technometrics · 1993 · 2.3K citations