Network structure and innovation: The leveraging of a dual network as a distinctive relational capability

Antonio Capaldo

Strategic Management Journal · 2007 · 114 citations · 66 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

The study investigates how strong dyadic interfirm ties and two network architectures—a strong ties network and a dual network—affect the lead firm’s innovative capability, using comparative longitudinal case studies of three design‑intensive furnishings manufacturers over more than 30 years. The authors operationalize interorganizational tie strength and examine the strengths of strong ties and the weaknesses of a strong ties network to understand alliance behavior. They find that integrating a large periphery of heterogeneous weak ties with a core of strong ties constitutes a distinctive relational capability that enables lead firms in knowledge‑intensive alliance networks to achieve sustainable competitive advantage through a dual network architecture. © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Abstract

Abstract This paper employs comparative longitudinal case study research to investigate why and how strong dyadic interfirm ties and two alternative network architectures (a ‘strong ties network’ and a ‘dual network’) impact the innovative capability of the lead firm in an alliance network. I answer these intrinsically cross‐level research questions by examining how three design‐intensive furnishings manufacturers managed their networks of joint‐design alliances with consulting industrial design firms over more than 30 years. Initially, in order to explore the sample lead firms' alliance behavior, I advance an operationalization of interorganizational tie strength. Next, I unveil the strengths of strong ties and the weaknesses of a strong ties network. Finally, I show that the ability to integrate a large periphery of heterogeneous weak ties and a core of strong ties is a distinctive lead firm's relational capability, one that provides fertile ground for leading firms in knowledge‐intensive alliance networks to gain competitive advantages whose sustainability is primarily based on the dynamic innovative capability resulting from leveraging a dual network architecture. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

References

66