Publication | Closed Access
Manufacturing flexibility: defining and analyzing relationships among competence, capability, and customer satisfaction
590
Citations
77
References
2002
Year
Customer SatisfactionEngineeringFlexible Manufacturing TechnologySmart ManufacturingVolume FlexibilityEmployee FlexibilityManagementSupply ChainSupply Chain ViabilityDesignManufacturing InnovationFlexible ManufacturingManufacturing SystemsSupply Chain ManagementFlexible Manufacturing SystemStrategic ManagementOperations ManagementMarketingDynamic CapabilityManufacturing StrategyBusinessAgile ManufacturingValue Chain Flexibility
Rapid shifts in customer expectations, competition, and technology create an uncertain environment, making manufacturing flexibility—producing varied products in demanded quantities while maintaining performance—a strategically vital capability for competitive advantage. The study aims to organize literature on manufacturing flexibility, classify it using competence and capability theory, and develop a framework to examine how flexible competence and capability relate to customer satisfaction. The authors created reliable measurement instruments for flexible competence and capability sub‑dimensions and applied structural equation modeling to a large‑scale sample of 273 firms. Results show that flexible manufacturing competence strongly predicts both volume and mix flexibility, and that both flexibility types are strongly positively associated with customer satisfaction.
Abstract Fast and dramatic changes in customer expectations, competition, and technology are creating an increasingly uncertain environment. To respond, manufacturers are seeking to enhance flexibility across the value chain. Manufacturing flexibility, a critical dimension of value chain flexibility, is the ability to produce a variety of products in the quantities that customers demand while maintaining high performance. It is strategically important for enhancing competitive position and winning customer orders. This research organizes literature on manufacturing flexibility and classifies it according to competence and capability theory. It describes a framework to explore the relationships among flexible competence (machine, labor, material handling, and routing flexibilities), flexible capability (volume flexibility and mix flexibility), and customer satisfaction. It develops valid and reliable instruments to measure the sub‐dimensions of manufacturing flexibility, and it applies structural equation modeling to a large‐scale sample ( n =273). The results indicate strong, positive, and direct relationships between flexible manufacturing competence and volume flexibility and between flexible manufacturing competence and mix flexibility. Volume flexibility and mix flexibility have strong, positive, and direct relationships with customer satisfaction.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1