Journal of Biological Chemistry · 2015 · 16 citations · 40 references
Life SciencesCell BiologyMolecular BiologyCell DivisionMolecular Cell BiologyCell Cycle ControlCell-cycle CheckpointsCell-cycle RegulationMitosisMitotic SpindleSpindle AssemblyMitotic FiguresMitotic Spindle Assembly CheckpointN-end Rule PathwaySpindle Assembly CheckpointUbiquitin-binding DomainsUbiquitin-mediated Cell Cycle ControlUbiquitin-mediated Cell-cycle RegulationUbiquitin-mediated Checkpoint Regulation
In this work, we identify physical and genetic interactions that implicate E3 identified by differential display (EDD) in promoting spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) function. During mitosis, the SAC initiates a mitotic checkpoint in response to chromosomes with kinetochores unattached to spindle pole microtubules. Similar to Budding uninhibited by benzimidazoles-related 1 (BUBR1) siRNA, a bona fide SAC component, EDD siRNA abrogated G2/M accumulation in response to the mitotic destabilizing agent nocodazole. Furthermore, EDD siRNA reduced mitotic cell viability and, in nocodazole-treated cells, increased expression of the promitotic progression protein cell division cycle 20 (CDC20). Copurification studies also identified physical interactions with CDC20, BUBR1, and other components of the SAC. Taken together, these observations highlight the potential role of EDD in regulating mitotic progression and the cellular response to perturbed mitosis. In this work, we identify physical and genetic interactions that implicate E3 identified by differential display (EDD) in promoting spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) function. During mitosis, the SAC initiates a mitotic checkpoint in response to chromosomes with kinetochores unattached to spindle pole microtubules. Similar to Budding uninhibited by benzimidazoles-related 1 (BUBR1) siRNA, a bona fide SAC component, EDD siRNA abrogated G2/M accumulation in response to the mitotic destabilizing agent nocodazole. Furthermore, EDD siRNA reduced mitotic cell viability and, in nocodazole-treated cells, increased expression of the promitotic progression protein cell division cycle 20 (CDC20). Copurification studies also identified physical interactions with CDC20, BUBR1, and other components of the SAC. Taken together, these observations highlight the potential role of EDD in regulating mitotic progression and the cellular response to perturbed mitosis.
40
Promotion of microtubule assembly in vitro by taxol
Peter B. Schiff, Jane Fant, Susan Band Horwitz · Nature · 1979 · 3.6K citations
TRF2 Protects Human Telomeres from End-to-End Fusions
Bas van Steensel, Agata Smogorzewska, Titia de Lange · Cell · 1998 · 1.7K citations · Full text
Chromosome Segregation Errors as a Cause of DNA Damage and Structural Chromosome Aberrations
Aniek Janssen, Marja van der Burg, Károly Szuhai et al. · Science · 2011 · 593 citations
Life Sciences, Genetics, Oncology +17