Positioning community art practices in urban cracks

Griet Verschelden, Elly Van Eeghem, Riet Steel, Sven De Visscher, Carlos Dekeyrel

International Journal of Lifelong Education · 2012 · 18 citations · 26 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Community art practices re‑conceptualise community and art in public space, using urban cracks—dynamic, contested sites that challenge consensus, foster collective learning, and make urban areas more public—as contexts for praxis that engages the city’s material and relational dimensions. The article investigates how community art practitioners position themselves within urban cracks, emphasizing the need to read and analyse the social and spatial context of their work. Notes 1.

Abstract

Abstract This article addresses the position of community art practices and the role of practitioners in urban cracks. Community art practices raise possibilities for a reconceptualisation of the concept of community and an extension of the concept of art in public space. Urban cracks are conceptualised as spatial, temporal and relational manifestations of changing dynamics in the city, in which different logics and needs conflict. Urban cracks can be seen as tempting urban spaces for adult educators and artists because they have the possibility to challenge the consensus over living together in the city, to fuel collective learning processes and democratic moments and to make urban spaces more 'public'. Therefore practitioners in community art need to make an investment in reading and analysing the social and spatial context of their work. In this view, community art practices position themselves as a contextualised praxis in the community: not only working in but also working with this context. Notes 1. 'The city should not be used as an art gallery for an additional monument designed out of the city. If the city is a work of art, it is in its stones, in its way of being' (Cauquelin Citation1999).

References

26