Internal representations of the motor apparatus: Implications from generalization in visuomotor learning.

Hiroshi Imamizu, Yoji Uno, Mitsuo Kawato

Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · 1995 · 115 citations · 3 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Computational studies propose that the motor system learns internal models of kinematic or dynamic transformations, which can be either structured—requiring an analytical description but enabling generalization—or tabular—requiring no prior knowledge but lacking generalization. The study examined whether humans use structured or tabular representations to generalize kinematic transformations. Results indicate that humans employ nonstructured, nontabular internal representations, possibly reflecting a neural network with a moderate number of neurons and synapses.

Abstract

Recent computational studies have proposed that the motor system acquires internal models of kinematic transformations, dynamic transformations, or both by learning. Computationally, internal models can be characterized by 2 extreme representations: structured and tabular (C. G. Atkeson, 1989). Tabular models do not need prior knowledge about the structure of the motor apparatus, but they lack the capability to generalize learned movements. Structured models, on the other hand, can generalize learned movements, but they require an analytical description of the motor apparatus. In investigating humans' capacity to generalize kinematic transformations, we examined which type of representation humans' motor system might use. Results suggest that internal representations are nonstructured and nontabular. Findings may be due to a neural network model with a medium number of neurons and synapses.

References

3