Conceptions of Ability, Achievement Goals, and Individual Differences in Self‐Handicapping Behavior: On the Application of Implicit Theories

TLDR

Self‑handicapping is viewed as a self‑protective behavior rooted in cognitive processes. The study examined whether differences in self‑handicapping are linked to beliefs about ability malleability and to distinct achievement goals. High self‑handicappers view ability as innate and favor performance goals, whereas low self‑handicappers see ability as malleable and pursue learning goals.

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study tested the hypothesis that individual differences in the tendency to engage in self‐handicapping were related to beliefs about the mutability of ability attributes and the pursuit of different achievement goals. Correlational data indicated that high self‐handicappers as defined by the Self‐handicapping Scale (Jones & Rhodewalt, 1982) believed that ability traits were more innately determined. They were mote likely to endorse performance goals (demonstration of ability) than were low self‐handicappers. Low self‐handicappers, in contrast, held a more incremental view of ability traits and pursued learning goals (increasing competence). Results are discussed in terms of the cognitive underpinnings of self‐protective behavior.