Food Additives & Contaminants · 1998 · 21 citations · 9 references
EngineeringChemical EngineeringFood ScienceFood AnalysisSeparation ProcessesSeparation ScienceChromatographyExtraction TechniquesSolvent ExtractionSupercritical Fluid ChromatographySupercritical Fluid ExtractionAnalytical Supercritical Fluid ExtractionConditionsExtraction EfficiencyExtraction Efficiency AssessmentExtraction Of Organic CompoundsMolecular VolumeSolvent SelectionTemperature Effects On Extraction
Maximal potential migration of six antioxidants (AO) from five polypropylene (PP) formulations was determined by two supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) procedures, both of which contained static and dynamic steps. All analytical conditions affecting the extraction were studied and optimized using Irgafos 168 as standard. SFE was more efficient as temperature and fluid density increased. During the static step in which the samples were exposed to the fluid without flux, the introduction of hexane and methanol as fluid modifiers significantly improved the extraction. Hexane appears to facilitate polymer swelling while methanol solvates the antioxidants. In the dynamic step (in which the extraction actually occurs) time is the key parameter. Extraction for 90 min results in an efficiency of around 75%. The introduction of modifiers during this step (by an HPLC-SFE procedure) did not produce any significant improvement. When SFE was carried out on all samples, extraction efficiency was around 75% except for Irganox 1010 and Hostanox O3. The large molecular volume of these antioxidants may be responsible for the considerable reduction of extraction efficiency. Particle size and shape of polymer sample were also important. The greater the surface to volume ratio the greater the extraction efficiency.
9
Evaluation of plastics for food packaging
O. Piringer · Food Additives & Contaminants · 1994 · 112 citations
Journal of the American Dietetic Association · 1993 · 91 citations