The Mitotic Spindle Checkpoint Is a Critical Determinant for Topoisomerase-based Chemotherapy

Celia Vogel, Anne Kienitz, Rolf Müller, Holger Bastians

Journal of Biological Chemistry · 2004 · 51 citations · 19 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

Abstract

A novel strategy in cancer therapy is the induction of mitotic cell death by the pharmacological abrogation of cell cycle checkpoints. UCN-01 is such a compound that overrides the G2 cell cycle arrest induced by DNA damage and forces cells into a deleterious mitosis. The molecular pathways leading to mitotic cell death are largely unknown although recent evidence indicates that mitotic cell death represents a special case of apoptosis. Here, we demonstrate that the mitotic spindle checkpoint is activated upon chemotherapeutic treatment with topoisomerase II poisons and UCN-01. Cells that are forced to enter mitosis in the presence of topoisomerase inhibition arrest transiently in a prometaphase like state. By using a novel pharmacological inhibitor of the spindle checkpoint and spindle checkpoint-deficient cells we show that the spindle checkpoint function is required for the mitotic arrest and, most importantly, for efficient induction of mitotic cell death. Thus, our results demonstrate that the mitotic spindle checkpoint is an important determinant for the outcome of a chemotherapy based on the induction of mitotic cell death. Its frequent inactivation in human cancer might contribute to the observed resistance of tumor cells to these chemotherapeutic drugs. A novel strategy in cancer therapy is the induction of mitotic cell death by the pharmacological abrogation of cell cycle checkpoints. UCN-01 is such a compound that overrides the G2 cell cycle arrest induced by DNA damage and forces cells into a deleterious mitosis. The molecular pathways leading to mitotic cell death are largely unknown although recent evidence indicates that mitotic cell death represents a special case of apoptosis. Here, we demonstrate that the mitotic spindle checkpoint is activated upon chemotherapeutic treatment with topoisomerase II poisons and UCN-01. Cells that are forced to enter mitosis in the presence of topoisomerase inhibition arrest transiently in a prometaphase like state. By using a novel pharmacological inhibitor of the spindle checkpoint and spindle checkpoint-deficient cells we show that the spindle checkpoint function is required for the mitotic arrest and, most importantly, for efficient induction of mitotic cell death. Thus, our results demonstrate that the mitotic spindle checkpoint is an important determinant for the outcome of a chemotherapy based on the induction of mitotic cell death. Its frequent inactivation in human cancer might contribute to the observed resistance of tumor cells to these chemotherapeutic drugs. The mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint prevents the onset of anaphase as long as a single chromosome is unattached to the mitotic spindle, thus ensuring proper chromosome alignment and chromosomal stability. Several proteins, including Mad1, Mad2, Bub1, BubR1, Bub3, and Mps1, which are specifically recruited to unbound kinetochores upon checkpoint activation, are required for the spindle checkpoint (1Bharadwaj R. Yu H. Oncogene. 2004; 23: 2016-2027Crossref PubMed Scopus (433) Google Scholar). Spindle-damaging chemotherapeutic drugs like taxanes (e.g. paclitaxel and docetaxel) and various Vinca alkaloids (e.g. vinblastine and vincristine) are frequently used in the clinic and activate the spindle checkpoint leading to a transient mitotic arrest (2Jordan M.A. Wilson L. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2004; 4: 253-265Crossref PubMed Scopus (3563) Google Scholar). Upon prolonged spindle damage, however, cells undergo apoptosis, which represents the final outcome of chemotherapy. Significantly, spindle checkpoint defects are frequently observed in human cancer including breast, colon, lung, ovarian, and hepatocellular carcinomas (3Wang X. Jin D.Y. Ng R.W. Feng H. Wong Y.C. Cheung A.L. Tsao S.W. Cancer Res. 2002; 62: 1662-1668PubMed Google Scholar, 4Cahill D.P. Lengauer C. Yu J. Riggins G.J. Willson J.K. Markowitz S.D. Kinzler K.W. Vogelstein B. Nature. 1998; 392: 300-303Crossref PubMed Scopus (1314) Google Scholar, 5Saeki A. Tamura S. Ito N. Kiso S. Matsuda Y. Yabuuchi I. Kawata S. Matsuzawa Y. Cancer. 2002; 94: 2047-2054Crossref PubMed Scopus (68) Google Scholar, 6Yoon D.S. Wersto R.P. Zhou W. Chrest F.J. Garrett E.S. Kwon T.K. Gabrielson E. Am. J. Pathol. 2002; 161: 391-397Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (92) Google Scholar, 7Takahashi T. Haruki N. Nomoto S. Masuda A. Saji S. Osada H. Takahashi T. Oncogene. 1999; 18: 4295-4300Crossref PubMed Scopus (116) Google Scholar). Interestingly, these defects have recently been associated with resistance to spindle damaging chemotherapeutic drugs (8Sudo T. Nitta M. Saya H. Ueno N.T. Cancer Res. 2004; 64: 2502-2508Crossref PubMed Scopus (226) Google Scholar, 9Masuda A. Maeno K. Nakagawa T. Saito H. Takahashi T. Am. J. Pathol. 2003; 163: 1109-1116Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (99) Google Scholar, 10Kasai T. Iwanaga Y. Iha H. Jeang K.T. J. Biol. Chem. 2002; 277: 5187-5193Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (106) Google Scholar). Another large group of routinely used chemotherapeutics are various topoisomerase II poisons (e.g. etoposide/VP16, adriamycin/doxorubicin). These agents are thought to cause DNA damage and induce cell cycle arrest followed by the induction of cell death. While the cell cycle arrest in the G1 phase depends on p53, a G2 arrest can also occur in p53-deficient cells (11Shapiro G.I. Harper J.W. J. Clin. Invest. 1999; 104: 1645-1653Crossref PubMed Scopus (367) Google Scholar). A novel strategy for tumor therapy selectively targeting p53-deficient tumor cells is the drug-mediated inactivation of the G2 cell cycle arrest. UCN-01, which has successfully completed phase I clinical trials, is such a compound that abrogates potently the G2 arrest in p53-deficient tumor cells (12Wang Q. Fan S. Eastman A. Worland P.J. Sausville E.A. O'Connor P.M. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1996; 88: 956-965Crossref PubMed Scopus (450) Google Scholar). Treatment with UCN-01 induces mitotic entry in the presence of topoisomerase inhibition and greatly enhances cell death. Therefore, entry into mitosis in the presence of DNA damage appears to be an important determinant for chemotherapy outcome, but the mechanisms of the induction of mitotic cell death are not defined (13Tse A.N. Schwartz G.K. Cancer Res. 2004; 64: 6635-6644Crossref PubMed Scopus (89) Google Scholar, 14Bunch R.T. Eastman A. Clin. Cancer Res. 1996; 2: 791-797PubMed Google Scholar, 15Shao R.G. Cao C.X. Shimizu T. O'Connor P.M. Kohn K.W. Pommier Y. Cancer Res. 1997; 57: 4029-4035PubMed Google Scholar). Recently, Gö6976, a compound similar to UCN-01, was also shown to potently abrogate the G2 arrest, and it was proposed to be a promising G2 cell cycle checkpoint abrogator for clinical studies (16Kohn E.A. Yoo C.J. Eastman A. Cancer Res. 2003; 63: 31-35PubMed Google Scholar). Cell Culture—HCT116, HCT116-p53–/– (kindly provided by Dr. Bert Vogelstein, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore) (17Bunz F. Dutriaux A. Lengauer C. Waldman T. Zhou S. Brown J.P. Sedivy J.M. Kinzler K.W. Vogelstein B. Science. 1998; 282: 1497-1501Crossref PubMed Scopus (2538) Google Scholar) and HCT116-MAD2+/– cells (a gift from Dr. Loren Michel and Dr. Robert Benezra, Cornell University, New York) (18Michel L.S. Liberal V. Chatterjee A. Kirchwegger R. Pasche B. Gerald W. Dobles M. Sorger P.K. Murty V.V. Benezra R. Nature. 2001; 409: 355-359Crossref PubMed Scopus (645) Google Scholar) were grown as described (19Vogel C. Kienitz A. Hofmann I. Muller R. Bastians H. Oncogene. 2004; 23: 6845-6853Crossref PubMed Scopus (130) Google Scholar). Western Blotting—Cells were lysed and semidry westernblotting was performed as described (19Vogel C. Kienitz A. Hofmann I. Muller R. Bastians H. Oncogene. 2004; 23: 6845-6853Crossref PubMed Scopus (130) Google Scholar) using the following antibodies: anti-PARP 1The abbreviations used are: PARP, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase; FACS, fluorescence-activated cell sorter; DAPI, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; Pipes, 1,4-piperazinediethanesulfonic acid; Chaps, 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonic acid. (Pharmingen), anti-actin (Sigma), secondary antibodies conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Jackson ImmunoResearch). Flow Cytometry—For FACS analyses DNA was stained using propidium iodide, and the mitotic index was determined by staining for the MPM2 epitope following procedures as described (19Vogel C. Kienitz A. Hofmann I. Muller R. Bastians H. Oncogene. 2004; 23: 6845-6853Crossref PubMed Scopus (130) Google Scholar). Apoptotic cells were counted as cells containing a sub-G1 DNA content and were verified by staining apoptotic nuclei with DAPI. Microscopy—Cells were fixed for 10 min in 1% p-formaldehyde/PHEM (60 mm Pipes, pH 7.0, 27 mm Hepes, 10 mm EGTA, 4 mm MgSO4) and permeabilized in 1% Chaps/PHEM for 10 min. Anti-CREST (Europa Bioproducts), anti-Bub1, anti-BubR1 (kind gifts from Dr. Stephen Taylor, Manchester, UK), donkey anti-sheep antibodies conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488 (Molecular Probes) and donkey anti-human antibodies conjugated to RedX (Jackson ImmunoResearch) were applied for 2 h at room temperature. DNA was stained for 5 min with 1 μg/ml Hoechst. Mitotic Cell Death Is Associated with the Activation of the Spindle Checkpoint—We wished to investigate whether the spindle checkpoint is involved in mitotic cell death induced by chemotherapeutic treatment. Treatment of p53-deficient human colon carcinoma cells (HCT116-p53–/–) with adriamycin resulted in a cell cycle arrest in G2 before entry into mitosis (data not shown). Consistent with previous work (12Wang Q. Fan S. Eastman A. Worland P.J. Sausville E.A. O'Connor P.M. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1996; 88: 956-965Crossref PubMed Scopus (450) Google Scholar), addition of UCN-01 abrogated the G2 arrest and increased the proportion of mitotic cells in p53 deficient but not in wild-type cells within a short time interval (Fig. 1A). We noted that cells, which were forced to enter mitosis by treatment with UCN-01, accumulated in mitosis in a time-dependent manner, and this was not significantly further enhanced by treatment with nocodazole (data not shown). This observation raised the possibility that the mitotic spindle checkpoint might be activated when cells enter mitosis upon topoisomerase inhibition before cell death occurs. To test this, we determined the localization of Bub1 and BubR1 in cells treated with adriamycin and UCN-01. Clearly, cells arrested in a prometaphase-like state with condensed and unaligned chromosomes and both, Bub1 and BubR1, were co-localized with CREST at kinetochores, demonstrating an activated spindle checkpoint (Fig. 1B). Thus, cells arrest before anaphase in a spindle checkpoint-dependent manner in response to topoisomerase poison and UCN-01 treatment. The Indolocarbazole Compound Gö6976 Is a Potent Inhibitor of the Mitotic Spindle Checkpoint—In a recent report, Gö6976, an indolocarbazole compound structurally similar to UCN-01, was found to be a similarly potent abrogator of the G2 DNA damage checkpoint (16Kohn E.A. Yoo C.J. Eastman A. Cancer Res. 2003; 63: 31-35PubMed Google Scholar). Interestingly, we identified Gö6976 in an independent screen for inhibitors of the mitotic spindle checkpoint. 2A. Kienitz, C. Vogel, R. Müller, and H. Bastians, manuscript in preparation. Gö6976, but not UCN-01, potently overrides the spindle checkpoint-mediated mitotic arrest in response to nocodazole or taxol (Fig. 2A). Significantly, when applied to asynchronously growing cells, Gö6976 greatly inhibited spindle checkpoint dependent accumulation of mitotically arrested cells in response to nocodazole without causing disturbation of the cell cycle per se (Fig. 2B and data not shown). Thus, both UCN-01 and Gö6976 are inhibitors of the G2 DNA damage checkpoint; however, Gö6976 is the first potent pharmacological spindle checkpoint inhibitor that can be used as a tool to convert asynchronously growing wild-type cells into spindle checkpoint-compromised cells. The Spindle Checkpoint Is Required for Mitotic Cell Death Induced by Topoisomerase Poison and UCN-01 Treatment— The identification of Gö6976 as an abrogator of the DNA damage-induced G2 arrest and as a potent inhibitor of the spindle checkpoint allowed us to ask whether the spindle checkpoint is involved in topoisomerase poison induced mitotic arrest and cell death. We treated HCT-p53–/– cells with adriamycin and either UCN-01 or Gö6976. As expected, both inhibitors, but not adriamycin alone, greatly enhanced the mitotic index within short time intervals. Consistent with the observation that Gö6976 acts as a potent inhibitor of the spindle checkpoint, the mitotic arrest in Gö6976-treated cells was compromised (Fig. 2C). Most significantly, entry into mitosis was associated with the induction of cell death and this was clearly diminished in cells treated with Gö6976 (Fig. 2D). To demonstrate that Gö6976 efficiently overrides the G2 checkpoint and drives cells through mitosis without a prolonged mitotic delay or arrest we determined the DNA content after 24 and 48 h of treatment. We found that Gö6976 treatment grossly induces endoreduplication and only a small proportion of cells showed a 4 n DNA content typical for G2 cell cycle arrest (Fig. 2, E and F). Similarly, endoreduplication is typically observed in spindle checkpoint-compromised cells upon a premature exit from mitosis (19Vogel C. Kienitz A. Hofmann I. Muller R. Bastians H. Oncogene. 2004; 23: 6845-6853Crossref PubMed Scopus (130) Google Scholar). Taken together, by using a novel pharmacological inhibitor of the spindle checkpoint we showed that the spindle checkpoint is required for a mitotic arrest and for an efficient induction of cell death in response to topoisomerase poison treatment. Spindle Checkpoint-compromised Cells Escape from Topoisomerase Poison-induced Apoptosis—To directly address whether the spindle checkpoint is required for topoisomerase poison-induced apoptosis, we used HCT116 and isogenic cells in which one allele of the spindle checkpoint gene MAD2 had been deleted (HCT-MAD2+/–). As shown before (18Michel L.S. Liberal V. Chatterjee A. Kirchwegger R. Pasche B. Gerald W. Dobles M. Sorger P.K. Murty V.V. Benezra R. Nature. 2001; 409: 355-359Crossref PubMed Scopus (645) Google Scholar), MAD2+/– cells are spindle checkpoint-defective as indicated by a dramatically reduced mitotic arrest in response to spindle damage (Fig. 3A). In response to topoisomerase poison treatment MAD2+/– cells arrested initially in G1 and G2 similar to wild-type cells indicating functional DNA damage checkpoint pathways in these cells (Fig. 3B). In agreement with previous studies (13Tse A.N. Schwartz G.K. Cancer Res. 2004; 64: 6635-6644Crossref PubMed Scopus (89) Google Scholar), prolonged inhibitor treatment results in an adaption of the DNA damage checkpoint, escape from the cell cycle arrest, entry into mitosis, and induction of cell death. Therefore, we treated HCT-wild-type and the isogenic spindle checkpoint-compromised derivatives with different concentrations of adriamycin or 5-fluoruracil for prolonged time intervals and determined the rate of apoptosis. As expected, we found an induction of cell death in response to topoisomerase poison treatment in wildtype cells. However, cell death was significantly impaired in spindle checkpoint-compromised cells (Fig. 3C, left panels). The escape from apoptosis was verified by determining the cleavage of PARP, a general and specific parameter of apoptosis (Fig. 3C, right panel). In contrast, we found no significant difference in the rate of apoptosis in both isogenic cell lines upon 5-fluoruracil treatment (Fig. 3D) and UV irradiation (data not shown) indicating that spindle checkpoint-compromised cells are not defective in apoptosis per se. Similarly, the escape from apoptosis was also observed in spindle checkpoint-compromised cells upon treatment with etoposide/VP-16, another frequently used topoisomerase II poison (Fig. 3E). UCN-01, which has successfully completed phase I clinical trials, is a promising anti-cancer drug that is used in combination with DNA-damaging agents to induce mitotic cell death (11Shapiro G.I. Harper J.W. J. Clin. Invest. 1999; 104: 1645-1653Crossref PubMed Scopus (367) Google Scholar, 12Wang Q. Fan S. Eastman A. Worland P.J. Sausville E.A. O'Connor P.M. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1996; 88: 956-965Crossref PubMed Scopus (450) Google Scholar, 13Tse A.N. Schwartz G.K. Cancer Res. 2004; 64: 6635-6644Crossref PubMed Scopus (89) Google Scholar). Although the induction of mitotic cell death is a major determinant for the chemotherapy outcome, the underlying molecular pathways are largely unknown. Most recently, it has been shown that the activation of caspase-2 and caspase-3 and the permeabilization of the mitochondrial membrane are associated with mitotic cell death indicating that it might represent a special case of apoptosis (20Castedo M. Perfettini J.L. Roumier T. Valent A. Raslova H. Yakushijin K. Horne D. Feunteun J. Lenoir G. Medema R. Vainchenker W. Kroemer G. Oncogene. 2004; 23: 4362-4370Crossref PubMed Scopus (264) Google Scholar). Here, we show that the mitotic cell death induced by topoisomerase poisons and UCN-01 is preceded by a prolonged and spindle checkpoint-mediated mitotic arrest. Moreover, the mitotic spindle checkpoint is required for the induction of mitotic apoptosis suggesting that the activation of the mitotic spindle checkpoint associated with a prolonged mitotic arrest is a prerequisites for triggering mitotic cell death. Similarly, we and others (9Masuda A. Maeno K. Nakagawa T. Saito H. Takahashi T. Am. J. Pathol. 2003; 163: 1109-1116Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (99) Google Scholar) 3A. Kienitz, C. Vogel, I. Morales, R. Müller, and H. Bastians, submitted for publication. have shown that the spindle checkpoint is required for efficient induction of apoptosis in response to spindle damage. Indeed, spindle checkpoint defects in human tumors have been correlated with resistance to paclitaxel (8Sudo T. Nitta M. Saya H. Ueno N.T. Cancer Res. 2004; 64: 2502-2508Crossref PubMed Scopus (226) Google Scholar, 9Masuda A. Maeno K. Nakagawa T. Saito H. Takahashi T. Am. J. Pathol. 2003; 163: 1109-1116Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (99) Google Scholar, 10Kasai T. Iwanaga Y. Iha H. Jeang K.T. J. Biol. Chem. 2002; 277: 5187-5193Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (106) Google Scholar). From our studies, it is expected that spindle checkpoint-compromised tumors are resistant not only toward spindle-damaging drugs like paclitaxel, vinblastine, and vincristine but also to therapies based on the induction of mitotic cell death-like treatments using UCN-01 in combination with topoisomerase poisons. Thus, the status of the mitotic spindle checkpoint is likely to represent a major determinant for the clinical outcome of these chemotherapeutic treatments. Furthermore, the inactivation of the spindle checkpoint in tumor cells might contribute directly to an acquired resistance to these cancer therapies. Our findings places the mitotic spindle checkpoint into a central position of the apoptotic cell death pathways induced by spindle-damaging agents and topoisomerase poisons. It is unknown how the spindle checkpoint triggers the apoptotic response, but it is tempting to speculate that molecules such as survivin that is involved in both, spindle checkpoint activation and apoptosis, might mediate the cross-talk between mitotic spindle checkpoint activation and induction of apoptosis (21Lens S.M. Wolthuis R.M. Klompmaker R. Kauw J. Agami R. Brummelkamp T. Kops G. Medema R.H. EMBO J. 2003; 22: 2934-2947Crossref PubMed Scopus (265) Google Scholar, 22Li F. Ackermann E.J. Bennett C.F. Rothermel A.L. Plescia J. Tognin S. Villa A. Marchisio P.C. Altieri D.C. Nat. Cell Biol. 1999; 1: 461-466Crossref PubMed Scopus (554) Google Scholar). It will be of great interest to elucidate how the activation of the spindle checkpoint and the apoptotic signaling are connected to develop novel therapies, which induce spindle checkpoint dependent apoptosis without harming normal cells. We thank Dr. Heike Krebber for suggestions on the manuscript, Dr. Stephen Taylor for antibodies, Dr. Bert Vogelstein, Dr. Loren Michel and Dr. Robert Benezra for cell lines, and the Developmental Therapeutics Program of the National Cancer Institute for providing a sample of UCN-01.

References

19