Green Niches in Sustainable Development: The Case of Organic Food in the United Kingdom

Adrian Smith

Environment and Planning C Government and Policy · 2006 · 279 citations · 35 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Strategic niche management is a policy approach that aims to seed radical transformations in sociotechnical regimes, yet literature paradoxically highlights the significance of the relationship between niches and mainstream regimes. This paper examines the relationship between radically novel sociotechnical practices in niches and the mainstream social–technical regimes they seek to influence. The case of organic food is used to explore this paradox empirically. The study finds that niches are more likely to influence mainstream change when compatible with incumbent regimes, but this compatibility blunts radical innovation and undermines regime transformation, as illustrated by the dialectical relationship between the organic food niche and the mainstream food regime.

Abstract

Strategic niche management is a recently developed policy approach which advocates claim, is important in seeding radical transformations in sociotechnical regimes, and transitions to environmentally sustainable regimes in particular. This paper examines a critically important aspect of this approach: the relationship between radically novel sociotechnical practices in niches and the mainstream social–technical regimes they seek to influence. Although the literature notes the significance of this relationship, it does so in a paradoxical way. It is argued that niches are more likely to influence mainstream change when they show a degree of compatibility with the incumbent regime. Yet this compatibility criterion blunts the scope for niches to be radically innovative, thereby undermining the degree of regime transformation being sought. The case of organic food is used to explore this paradox empirically. The history of the organic niche, and its engagement and entanglement with the mainstream food regime, suggests a dialectical relationship between sociotechnical niches and regimes.

References

35