The Journal-Reading Habits of Practicing MFTs

Abstract

Although authors in the field of family therapy are calling for bridging the gap between clinicians and researchers, it is not clear how well this integration is occurring in our journals. The purpose of this study was to gain a better understanding of the strengths of journal articles for clinicians; identify what weaknesses might exist; and share the implication of this information for authors, editors, or reviewers. In Phase 1, 42 practicing family therapists responded to an open-ended survey to determine the ways in which journal articles are helpful in their practice. Surveys were analyzed through analytic induction and constant comparative methods. In Phase 2, we surveyed family therapy journal editors and asked them about strategies to increase readership among clinicians in journals. In both phases, we identified both themes and categories. Findings indicated that family therapists believe journal articles are helpful when they provide new insights, discuss research relevant to practice, and are easy to read. Some limitations of journals include limited access and the formal language often used. We present recommendations developed by clinicians, editors of family therapy journals, and a former editor of the Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. These recommendations guide authors and editors of family therapy journals on writing and/or supporting clinician-friendly articles.