Further comments on analysis of covariance in insect dietary studies

Abstract

Abstract Raubenheimer & Simpson (1992) recently discussed the advantages of using analysis of covariance in insect dietary studies as an alternative to the more conventional ratio‐based nutritional indices. We expand on some interpretations of Raubenheimer & Simpson and illustrate our points with examples from published and unpublished data sets. Specifically, we show that an ANCOVA on biomass gain incorporating initial biomass as a covariate provides information not immediately available using the analysis suggested by Raubenheimer & Simpson (ANCOVA on final biomass incorporating initial biomass as a covariate). Second, we show that dietary studies in which the covariate (food consumption) is affected by diet can provide information about the relative importance of preingestive effects (e.g., deterrence) and postingestive effects (e.g., antibiosis) on performance. Cautions about this latter use of ANCOVA are discussed.