The Representation of Tool Use in Humans and Monkeys: Common and Uniquely Human Features

Ronald Peeters, Luciano Simone, Koen Nelissen, Maddalena Fabbri‐Destro, Wim Vanduffel, Giacomo Rizzolatti, Guy A. Orban

Journal of Neuroscience · 2009 · 371 citations · 74 references

DOIFull text

Open access

TL;DR

Humans uniquely grasp the causal link between tools and their outcomes, a capacity not shared by other primates. The study used fMRI to compare brain activity in human volunteers, untrained monkeys, and two tool‑trained monkeys while they observed hand and tool actions. Both species showed bilateral activation of occipitotemporal, intraparietal, and ventral premotor cortex, but humans uniquely activated a rostral left inferior parietal lobule region during tool observation, indicating an evolved human‑specific neural substrate for tool use.

Abstract

Though other species of primates also use tools, humans appear unique in their capacity to understand the causal relationship between tools and the result of their use. In a comparative fMRI study, we scanned a large cohort of human volunteers and untrained monkeys, as well as two monkeys trained to use tools, while they observed hand actions and actions performed using simple tools. In both species, the observation of an action, regardless of how performed, activated occipitotemporal, intraparietal, and ventral premotor cortex, bilaterally. In humans, the observation of actions done with simple tools yielded an additional, specific activation of a rostral sector of the left inferior parietal lobule (IPL). This latter site was considered human-specific, as it was not observed in monkey IPL for any of the tool videos presented, even after monkeys had become proficient in using a rake or pliers through extensive training. In conclusion, while the observation of a grasping hand activated similar regions in humans and monkeys, an additional specific sector of IPL devoted to tool use has evolved in Homo sapiens , although tool-specific neurons might reside in the monkey grasping regions. These results shed new light on the changes of the hominid brain during evolution.

References

74