Concepedia

Quality of Reporting of Randomized Trials as a Measure of Methodologic Quality

Karin Huwiler-Müntener

JAMA · 2002 · 400 citations · 8 references

DOI

Abstract

Similar quality of reporting may hide important differences in methodologic quality, and well-conducted trials may be reported badly. A clear distinction should be made between these 2 dimensions of the quality of RCTs.

References

8

The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials

David Moher, Kenneth F. Schulz, Douglas G. Altman · The Lancet · 2001 · 5.4K citations · Full text

, , +7

Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement

Colin B. Begg · JAMA · 1996 · 3.3K citations

, , +18

A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial

Thomas C. Chalmers, Harry Smith, Bradley A. Blackburn et al. · Controlled Clinical Trials · 1981 · 1.4K citations

, , +8

Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German

Matthias Egger, Tanja Zellweger-Zähner, Martin Schneider et al. · The Lancet · 1997 · 1K citations

, , +5

Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials

David Moher, Alison Jones, Leah Lepage et al. · JAMA · 2001 · 1K citations