Concepedia

Publication | Open Access

High-Throughput Genotyping with Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms

391

Citations

21

References

2001

Year

TLDR

Automated high‑throughput SNP genotyping is essential for large‑scale association studies. The study aims to provide PCR protocols and computational tools for high‑throughput, automated SNP genotyping. The authors developed PCR protocols using TaqMan or 5′ nuclease assays with automated computational assignment, and validated them by genotyping over 1,600 individuals for two SNPs. The method achieves <0.05 % error, can generate >1,000 genotypes per day with minimal equipment, allows new SNPs to be tested in under a week, has been applied to 23 additional SNPs across 13 genes, and revealed three likely pseudo‑SNPs due to duplication.

Abstract

To make large-scale association studies a reality, automated high-throughput methods for genotyping with single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are needed. We describe PCR conditions that permit the use of the TaqMan or 5′ nuclease allelic discrimination assay for typing large numbers of individuals with any SNP and computational methods that allow genotypes to be assigned automatically. To demonstrate the utility of these methods, we typed &gt;1600 individuals for a G-to-T transversion that results in a glutamate-to-aspartate substitution at position 298 in the endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene, and a G/C polymorphism (newly identified in our laboratory) in intron 8 of the 11–β hydroxylase gene. The genotyping method is accurate—we estimate an error rate of fewer than 1 in 2000 genotypes, rapid—with five 96-well PCR machines, one fluorescent reader, and no automated pipetting, over one thousand genotypes can be generated by one person in one day, and flexible—a new SNP can be tested for association in less than one week. Indeed, large-scale genotyping has been accomplished for 23 other SNPs in 13 different genes using this method. In addition, we identified three “pseudo-SNPs” (WIAF1161, WIAF2566, and WIAF335) that are probably a result of duplication.

References

YearCitations

Page 1