Arbitration and Litigation of Employment Claims: An Empirical Comparison

Theodore Eisenberg, Elizabeth T. Hill

2004 · 23 citations · 0 references

Full text

Open access

Concepts

Abstract

The authors conducted empirical research comparing court case and arbitrated outcomes for employment disputes. In cases not involving civil rights claims, they found little evidence that arbitrated outcomes materially differed from trial outcomes where the claimant was a higher-paid employee. Moreover, they found no statistically significant differences between employee win rates or in the median or mean awards in arbitration and litigation. They also reported evidence indicating that arbitrated disputes conclude more quickly than litigated disputes.