Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR) · 2015 · 10 citations · 37 references
ManagementBusiness EconomicsFinanceCapital StructureCorporate FinanceExecutive CompensationCapital Structure DeterminantsCapital Structure TheoryEquity CompensationFamily OwnershipOwnership StructureStock OptionsConcentrationExecutive Compensation DecisionsExecutive Compensation EffectsJensen's AlphaOwnership EffectsOwnership Structure EffectsPanel Data EstimationStock Options Compensation
The objective of this paper is to highlight the impact of ownership discrepancy and type (managers, families, institutions) on executive compensation.Basedon a sample of French listed firms and using panel data regressions, the results show that capital concentration (Jensen 1986) negatively affects both the level of total executive compensation and the probability of use of stock option incentive plans. This confirms our theoretical alignment hypothesis. Moreover, the results show no evidence of the existence of a significant effect of ownership discrepancy on managerial compensation.Institutional shareholders are likely to encourage the use of stock option incentive plans and managerial ownership positively and significantly influences the level of total and fixed compensation. Family shareholding negatively affects executive compensation variables.
37
Separation of Ownership and Control
Eugene F. Fama, Michael C. Jensen · The Journal of Law and Economics · 1983 · 19.1K citations
Corporate Ownership Around the World
Florencio López‐de‐Silanes, Andrei Shleifer · The Journal of Finance · 1999 · 10.7K citations · Full text
Large Shareholders and Corporate Control
Andrei Shleifer, Robert W. Vishny · Journal of Political Economy · 1986 · 8.6K citations
Management ownership and market valuation
Andrei Shleifer, Robert W. Vishny · Journal of Financial Economics · 1988 · 7.1K citations · Full text