PLoS ONE · 2015 · 10 citations · 5 references
Public HealthInfectious DiseasesDiagnostic MicrobiologyEarly DetectionTuberculosis ControlDiagnostic EvaluationDiagnostic Test EvaluationInfectious Disease ScreeningTuberculosis DiagnosisTuberculosis Diagnostic TestingTuberculosis PreventionDiagnostic Accuracy StudiesDiagnostic Testing AccuracyPathogen Antigen DetectionPrison Tuberculosis ScreeningTuberculosis Antigen DetectionTuberculosis Case DetectionTuberculosis ScreeningUrine-based Diagnostics
BACKGROUND: We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of the urine lipoarabinomannan (LAM) antigen detection assay (Clearview TB-ELISA) to screen for tuberculosis in a South African correctional facility. METHODS: Between September 2009 and October 2010, male offenders were screened for tuberculosis (symptoms, chest radiograph, two spot sputum specimens for microscopy and culture), and urine tested for LAM. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of LAM were calculated using definite and probable tuberculosis combined as our gold standard. FINDINGS: 33/871 (3.8%) participants (26% HIV-positive) had tuberculosis. Amongst HIV-positive vs. HIV-negative offenders the sensitivity and specificity of LAM was 7.1% vs. 0% and 98.5% vs. 99.8% respectively. CONCLUSION: Urine LAM ELISA has inadequate sensitivity for TB screening in this population.
5
Stephen D Lawn, Andrew D. Kerkhoff, Monica Vogt et al. · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · 2011 · 301 citations · Full text
Grant Theron, Richard N. van Zyl-Smit, Asheen Haripersad et al. · European Respiratory Journal · 2012 · 127 citations · Full text
Public Health, Infectious Diseases, Diagnostic Microbiology +13