Do Professional Traders Exhibit Loss Realization Aversion

Peter Locke, Steven C. Mann

SSRN Electronic Journal · 2001 · 88 citations · 20 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

Investor behavior such as the disposition effect and overconfidence contradicts traditional economic theory and has been documented mainly in retail accounts, forming the basis of behavioral finance explanations for asset returns. The study investigates whether professional futures traders exhibit behavioral finance patterns, specifically the disposition effect. Professional traders display a disposition effect, holding losing positions longer and in larger sizes than winners, and this loss‑realization aversion correlates with current and future trading success. Recent evidence supports these observations.

Abstract

Recent evidence (e.g. Odean, 1998a) describes investor behavior that is at odds with traditional economic theory. These alternative behaviors, such as those consistent with the disposition effect or overconfidence, form the basis for recent behavioral explanations for asset returns (e.g. Daniel, Hirshleifer and Subrahmanyam 1998a and 1998b, Odean 1998b, and Shumway, 1998). Notably, the evidence of alternative investor behavior is based largely on retail customer accounts those of amateur traders. In this paper we examine trades by populations of professional futures traders for evidence of activity best described by the “behavioral finance” literature. The data provide support for the existence of a disposition effect (derived from the prospect theory of Kahneman and Tversky 1979) among professional traders. We find that traders hold losing trades longer than winning trades and that average position sizes for losing trades are larger than for winners. Our evidence also indicates that relative aversion to loss realization is related to contemporaneous and future trader relative success.

References

20