Checklist for Quality Online Instruction: Outcomes for Learners, the Professor and the Institution

Abstract

The purposes of this paper are to examine the evolution of online instruction and to describe the outcomes to tools made in relation to the learners, instructor and department at a midsize university. Multiple differences are identified with online instruction compared to resident instruction. First, the learner populations are more diverse. Second, their familiarity with the use of computers and WebCT[R] varied significantly. Third, the traditional triangular interaction of instructor, learner, and content is more complicated with the introduction of technology, software, and, communication complicated the teaching environment. The application of twenty-four tools as they related to the learner, professor, content, technology, software, and communication resulted in the enhancement of teaching methods in online and resident instruction. The outcomes of quality of online instruction through the use of tools resulted in benefiting the learner, professor, and department at a midsize university. ********** The majority of two- and four-year college and universities across the United States are developing and delivering online courses (Davey, 1998). Many learners take core requirements at community colleges that transfer to an accredited four-year university after their sophomore year. Online courses offer learners supplemental courses in preparation for attending a university. Online learning provides a diverse group of people the opportunity to participate in higher education (Davey, 1998). The background of online learners may vary significantly among resident classroom learners, professionals in the community, and professionals who travel for their jobs. Resident instruction classroom learners may take a course online for a variety of reasons including a busy work schedule, time conflicts, and closed on-campus course due to full enrollment. Professionals anywhere may take an online course to strengthen their skills and/or build their portfolios. The purpose of this paper is to describe tools that assisted in establishing high quality online instruction of a Merchandising Certificate Series (MCS) at Colarado State University (CSU) (http://www.learn.colostate.edu/csun/). In addition to the typical triangular interaction in resident classroom instruction among the learner, instructor and content, online courses have two sets of interacting triangles. The first triangle consists of the learner, instructor, and content. The second triangle consists of technology, software and methods of communication (Hanna, Glowacki, Dudka & Concericao-Runleee, 2000) (see figure 1). This triangle represents the interaction that makes online learning a quality educational experience. A secondary purpose of the paper is to describe the positive outcomes for online learners, the instructor of a MCS, and the academic unit at a midsize university for using online education. [FIGURE 1 OMITTED] Most users of personal computers at one time or another (some more than others) will accidentally sabotage their online efforts by pressing the wrong computer key. This errant keystroke may, make the day seem like the worst day of the course, thereby also sabotaging the desire to take another online course in the future. In order to minimize such days, activities were built into the online courses in the MCS that 1) taught learners how to become proficient in using the technology, 2) allowed for human error while accepting responsibility for one's actions, and 3) provided encouragement to continue this course and other online courses. According to the Theory of Planned Behavior (Ajzen, 1985), consumers perceived ease or difficulty of performing a behavior is essential to whether or not the behavior will be carded out. It may be assumed that learners who are familiar with online courses or at least comfortable with using the Internet with be more prone to and eager to study via online curriculum. …