Publication | Closed Access
Strength-Based versus Traditional Social-Emotional Reports: Impact on Multidisciplinary Team Members’ Perceptions
42
Citations
24
References
2007
Year
Program ImplementationMock Combined ReportSocial PsychologyTraditional DataEducationMental Health InterventionMental HealthClassical Test TheoryStudent OutcomeOrganizational BehaviorPsychologySocial SciencesManagementOrganizational PsychologySocial SkillsSchool PsychologyStudent SuccessApplied Social PsychologySocial-emotional WellbeingGroup CommunicationBehavioral SupportPerformance StudiesOrganizational CommunicationMock Traditional ReportWork Group DynamicGroup CounselingPsychological Measurement
This study examines how adding strength-based data to traditional data for a student with emotional and behavioral disorders (EBD) impacts multidisciplinary team (MDT) members’ perceptions. The participants received either a mock Traditional Report, which included only traditional data, or a mock Combined Report, which included traditional and strength-based data. They were asked to make predictions about educational placement and short- and long-term outcomes. Report type did not have an impact on educational placement or long-term outcomes. Respondents receiving the Combined Report predicted more positive academic, social, and overall outcomes than did respondents receiving the Traditional Report. Strength-based information may improve perceptions of short-term outcomes, which may have a role in cultivating a more positive educational environment for students with EBD.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1