Validity Argumentation

Validity Argumentation is a formal, theory-driven process of constructing, presenting, and justifying claims about the appropriateness, coherence, and empirical support for score interpretations and uses within a specific assessment context, distinguishing itself from related validation practices by its explicit emphasis on logical structure, evidentiary integration, and systematic defense of inferential claims.

43

Publications

3.9K

Citations

79

Authors

64

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

10

Authors

79

  1. MT
    Michael T. Kane

    American College Testing, United States

    5 publications · 1.8K citations

    5

    h-index

  2. EJ
    Eric J. Warm

    University of Cincinnati Medical Center, United States

    2 publications · 58 citations

    2

    h-index

  3. RJ
    Robert J. Mislevy

    Educational Testing Service, United States

    2 publications · 139 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. CA
    Carol A. Chapelle

    Iowa State University, United States

    2 publications · 242 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. BK
    Benjamin Kinnear

    University of Cincinnati Medical Center, United States

    2 publications · 58 citations

    2

    h-index

1–5 of 79

Venues

  1. Journal of Educational Measurement

    6 publications · 998 citations

    6

    h-index

  2. Informal Logic

    4 publications · 137 citations

    4

    h-index

  3. 4

    h-index

  4. Psychological Bulletin

    2 publications · 952 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. Educational Measurement Issues and Practice

    EM · 2 publications · 159 citations

    2

    h-index

1–5