Validity Argumentation
Validity Argumentation is a formal, theory-driven process of constructing, presenting, and justifying claims about the appropriateness, coherence, and empirical support for score interpretations and uses within a specific assessment context, distinguishing itself from related validation practices by its explicit emphasis on logical structure, evidentiary integration, and systematic defense of inferential claims.
43
Publications
3.9K
Citations
79
Authors
64
Institutions
Publications per year
2017–2026
10
43
An argument-based approach to validity.
Michael T. Kane · Psychological Bulletin · 1992 · 886 citations
Five perspectives on the validity argument.
Lee J. Cronbach · 1988 · 203 citations
1–5 of 43
79
5
h-index
2
h-index
2
h-index
2
h-index
2
h-index
1–5 of 79
64
Educational Testing Service
Princeton, United States
4 h-index
4 publications
286 citations

Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Cincinnati, United States
2 h-index
2 publications
58 citations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Urbana, United States
2 h-index
2 publications
58 citations

University of Toronto
Toronto, Canada
2 h-index
3 publications
1.2K citations
Iowa State University
Ames, United States
2 h-index
2 publications
242 citations
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Munich, Germany
2 h-index
3 publications
74 citations

University of British Columbia
Vancouver, Canada
2 h-index
2 publications
613 citations

University of Cincinnati Medical Center
Cincinnati, United States
2 h-index
6 publications
164 citations
1–8 of 64
6 publications · 998 citations
6
h-index
4 publications · 137 citations
4
h-index
4 publications · 76 citations
4
h-index
2 publications · 952 citations
2
h-index
EM · 2 publications · 159 citations
2
h-index
1–5