Trial-to-practice Gap

Trial-To-Practice Gap is an academic concept in external validity that denotes a discrepancy between controlled research trial outcomes and their effective implementation or replicability in real-world settings due to contextual, methodological, or systemic differences.

47

Publications

4.6K

Citations

227

Authors

158

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

18

Variants

Evidence-to-practice GapResearch-to-practice Gap

Authors

227

  1. RE
    Russell E. Glasgow

    Oregon Research Institute, United States

    3 publications · 2.3K citations

    3

    h-index

  2. RS
    Rinad S. Beidas

    University of Pennsylvania, United States

    2 publications · 75 citations

    2

    h-index

  3. DT
    Diana Tang

    The University of Sydney, Australia

    2 publications · 22 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. VF
    Victoria Flood

    The University of Sydney, Australia

    2 publications · 22 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. PM
    Paul Mitchell

    The University of Sydney, Australia

    2 publications · 22 citations

    2

    h-index

1–5 of 227

Venues

  1. Trials

    3 publications · 65 citations

    3

    h-index

  2. Implementation Science

    IS · 3 publications · 192 citations

    3

    h-index

  3. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

    2 publications · 241 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. Clinical Psychology Science and Practice

    2 publications · 41 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research

    JSLHR · 1 publications · 31 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5